Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stace, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stace, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 1986:77(6):471-472
© 1986 The American Genetic Association 77:471-472


other

Genetics of self-Incompatibility in Calotis cuneifolia

Julla K. Davidson, and Helen M. Stace

J. K. Davidson is graduate student in the Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia. The authors thank Dr. B. Brown for help with the maximum likelihood estimate, and Dr. V. Vithanage for the aniline blue fluorescent technique of observing pollen tubes. This research was supported by the Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.

Dr. Stace's present address is: CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia.

Please address reprint requests to J. K. Davidson.

Abstract

Twelve plants from a diploid population of an Australian daisy Calotis cuneifolia were found to be self-incompatible. A diallel cross of all plants showed that each had a distinct incompatibility phenotype. Unilateral Incompatibility occurred in eight crosses. All incompatible pollen tubes were inhibited on the stigma surface. Each diallel of the progeny from a parental cross displayed four distinct phenotypes. The evidence presented is consistent with genetic control of incompatibility by a sporophytic one-locus system with several S alleles. A method for estimating the number of S alleles is presented. A maximum likelihood estimate of the number of S alleles in this sample is 12.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.