Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weeden, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ladizinsky, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weeden, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ladizinsky, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 1992:83(2):123-129
© 1992 The American Genetic Association 83:123-129


research-article

Extensive Conservation of Linkage Relationships Between Pea and Lentil Genetic Maps

N. F. Weeden, F. J. Muehlbauer, and G. Ladizinsky

Department of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University Geneva, NY 14456
USDAARS, Washington State University
Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Address correspondence to Dr. Weeden at the address above.

Abstract

A 560-cM linkage map consisting of 64 morphological, isozyme, and DNA markers, has been developed from an interspecific cross (Lens ervoides x L. Culinaris). In addition, nine markers were scored that assorted independently of any of the multilocus linkage groups. Comparison of this map with that established previously for Pisum sativum reveals eight regions in which linkages among marker loci appear to have been conserved since the divergence of the two genera. These conserved linkage groups constitute at least 250 cM, or approximately 40% of the known linkage map for Lens. The two genera represent disparate lineages within the legume tribe Vicease, indicating that all members of this tribe may possess linkage groups similar to those identified in Lens and Pisum. Instances where the Pisum and Lens maps differed included the regions surrounding the 45S ribosomal tandem repeats and the position and distribution of the genes encoding the small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase. We also found a highly repeated sequence unique to Lens that maps within a linkage group shared between the two genera and a cDNA sequence that displays significant variation in copy number within the genus Lens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DNA ResHome page
H. T.T. Phan, S. R. Ellwood, K. Adhikari, M. N. Nelson, and R. P. Oliver
The First Genetic and Comparative Map of White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.): Identification of QTLs for Anthracnose Resistance and Flowering Time, and a Locus for Alkaloid Content
DNA Res, May 26, 2007; (2007) dsm009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. F. HANCOCK
Contributions of Domesticated Plant Studies to our Understanding of Plant Evolution
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2005; 96(6): 953 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Zhu, H.-K. Choi, D. R. Cook, and R. C. Shoemaker
Bridging Model and Crop Legumes through Comparative Genomics
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1189 - 1196.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Zhu, D.-J. Kim, J.-M. Baek, H.-K. Choi, L. C. Ellis, H. Kuester, W. R. McCombie, H.-M. Peng, and D. R. Cook
Syntenic Relationships between Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis Reveal Extensive Divergence of Genome Organization
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 1018 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Doganlar, A. Frary, M.-C. Daunay, R. N. Lester, and S. D. Tanksley
A Comparative Genetic Linkage Map of Eggplant (Solanum melongena) and Its Implications for Genome Evolution in the Solanaceae
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1697 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. K. Santra, M. Tekeoglu, M. Ratnaparkhe, W. J. Kaiser, and F. J. Muehlbauer
Identification and Mapping of QTLs Conferring Resistance to Ascochyta Blight in Chickpea
Crop Sci., November 1, 2000; 40(6): 1606 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. H. Paterson, J. E. Bowers, M. D. Burow, X. Draye, C. G. Elsik, C.-X. Jiang, C. S. Katsar, T.-H. Lan, Y.-R. Lin, R. Ming, et al.
Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2000; 12(9): 1523 - 1540.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. D. Livingstone, V. K. Lackney, J. R. Blauth, R. van Wijk, and M. K. Jahn
Genome Mapping in Capsicum and the Evolution of Genome Structure in the Solanaceae
Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 1183 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Whitkus
Genetics of Adaptive Radiation in Hawaiian and Cook Islands Species of Tetramolopium (Asteraceae). II. Genetic Linkage Map and Its Implications for Interspecific Breeding Barriers
Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1209 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. D. Gale and K. M. Devos
Plant Comparative Genetics after 10 Years
Science, October 23, 1998; 282(5389): 656 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. D. Gale and K. M. Devos
Comparative genetics in the grasses
PNAS, March 3, 1998; 95(5): 1971 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J. L. Bennetzen and M. Freeling
The Unified Grass Genome: Synergy in Synteny
Genome Res., April 1, 1997; 7(4): 301 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Grant, P. Cregan, and R. C. Shoemaker
Genome organization in dicots: Genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis
PNAS, April 11, 2000; 97(8): 4168 - 4173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.