Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piñeiro, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piñeiro, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 1992:83(2):85-91
© 1992 The American Genetic Association 83:85-91


research-article

Canalization at Two Extra Scutellar Bristles: Artificial Selection, Chromosome Analysis, and Effect of Temperature

R. Piñeiro

Departamento de Biologia Funcional-Genética, Universidad de Oviedo 33071 Oviedo, Spain

Abstract

Two isofemale lines (P1 and P2) from a wild-type population of Drosophila melanogaster were selected for an invariant phenotype, two symmetrical and anterior scutellar extra bristles. Both P1 and P2 lines responded quickly to direct selection for two extra bristles, but although this phenotype was canalized in the P2 line, it was not in the P1 line. This lack of canalization at two extra bristles, measured by probit width, is the first reported in the literature. Analysis of chromosomal contribution showed the P1 decanalized phenotype to be due to chromosome 2. Synthetic chromosomal combinations were tested at four development temperatures (17°, 21°, 24°, and 30°C), and no correlation was observed between canalization at two extra bristles measured by probit width and minimum phenotypic change due to different temperatures. In this test, development at the highest temperatures was accompanied by an increased tendency to return to the wild phenotype in the canalized phenotypes only, suggesting that this drastic change could be accounted for by the action of the wild-type canalizing system. Decanalized genotypes, or those canalizing at phenotypes other than the wild type, could be explained by mutations which, to a greater or lesser degree, alter the normal genetic system of canalization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.