Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charlesworth, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charlesworth, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 1993:84(5):345-350
© 1993 The American Genetic Association 84:345-350

other

The Evolution of Sex and Recombination in a Varying Environment

B. Charlesworth

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637

Abstract

Theoretical models of the evolutionary advantages of sex and genetic recombination in a temporally varying environment are analyzed. The models assume a quantitative trait controlled by many additive genes and subject to nor-optimal selection. The optimal value of the trait is assumed either to move steadily in one direction or to follow an autocorrelated linear Markov process. The consequences for population mean fitness of a reduction in genetic variance, due to a shift from sexual to asexual reproduction, are examined. It is shown that a large reduction in mean fitness can result from such a shift in the case of a steadily moving optimum, under light conditions. The conditions are much more stringent with a randomly varying environment, especially if the autocorrelation is low. The conditions for spread of a rare modifier affecting the rate of genetic recombination are also examined, and the strength of selection on such a modifier is determined. Again, the case of a steadily moving optimum is more favorable than a random optimum for the evolution of increased recombination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. MacCarthy and A. Bergman
Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction
PNAS, July 31, 2007; 104(31): 12801 - 12806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J HeredHome page
C. F. Rodell, M. R. Schipper, and D. K. Keenan
Modes of Selection and Recombination Response in Drosophila melanogaster
J. Hered., January 1, 2004; 95(1): 70 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
R. Burger
Evolution of Genetic Variability and the Advantage of Sex and Recombination in Changing Environments
Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 1055 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.