Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soulé, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zegers, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Soulé, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zegers, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 1996:87(5):341-350
© 1996 The American Genetic Association 87:341-350

research-article

Phenetics of Natural Populations. V. Genetic Correlates of Phenotypic Variation in the Pocket Gopher (Thomomys bottae) in California

M. E. Soulé, and G. P. Zegers

Board of Environmental Studies University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, CA 96064
The Board of Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, CA 96064

Corresponding Editor: Robert Wayne

Abstract

A comparison of electrophoretic and cranial (osteometric) variation in adult male and female pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) confirms the existence of a genetic-phenetic variation correlation (GPVC)— a correlation of genetic variation and morphological variation over a set of natural populations. In males, characters correlated with body size give the highest GPVCs; in females, the characters with the highest GPVCs tend to be poorly correlated with body size. Genetic variation, as measured by variation in allozymes, explains up to half of the heterogeneity among populations in levels of morphological variation for some characters in females; in mates about 80% of the heterogeneity of phenotypic variation is explained by allozyme heterozygosity. There is no evidence for a correlation between individual heterozygosity and growth rate or body size for individuals within a population. The simplest way to explain these results is to assume that estimates of heterozygosity based on protein variation are correlated with the amount of additive genetic variation in populations. DNA fingerprint (heterogeneity of minisatellite regions) data from six populations are consistent with the electrophoretic and morphological results, although there is evidence that fingerprint heterogeneity in populations does not increase linearly with allozyme heterozygosity or morphological variability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. K. Hildner and M. E. Soule
Relationship between the energetic cost of burrowing and genetic variability among populations of the pocket gopher, T. bottae: does physiological fitness correlate with genetic variability?
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 207(13): 2221 - 2227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.