| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Journal of Heredity 1997:88(1):1-7
© 1997 The American Genetic Association 88:1-7
research-article |
Plant Genetic Diversity and the Struggel to Measure Selection
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, CA 92521
Abstract
The fundamental research program of population genetics has been to seek a quantitative assessment of the role of the various forces of evolution in shaping patterns of genetic variation. This goal has been pursued on both empirical and theoretical fronts. The introduction of biochemical and molecular techniques into population genetics more than 25 years ago reveald vast stores of genetic variation within populations. This level of genetic diversity is difficult to reconcile with balancing selection, and as a consequence, recent thinking has emphasized the role of mutation and genetic random drift as the primary determinants of genetic diversity. The resulting neutral theory of molecular evolution has dominated population genetic thought for more than 20 years. Nonadaptive theories have also emphasized the role of deleterious mutations in driving evolutionary change. New insights into the relative importance of selection and genetic random drift can now be obtained from samples of DNA sequences of genes drawn from within species. The elaboration of coalescene theory, together with the accumulation of data on gene genealogies, permits an integration over relatively long periods of evolutionary time. The ability to integrate over long periods of evolutionary time permits the detection of small selection intensities and it reveals some information about the mode of selection. When the genealogy is consistent with a neutral process, the effective population size can be estimated, as can the age of the coalescent, thus providing new empirical approaches to the estimation of these important parameters. Applications of these approaches in plant population genetics are still in their infancy, but they have already provided new insights into effective population sizes and they are beginning to illustrate how selection for domestication has affected plant genomes.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. L. Small and J. F. Wendel Differential Evolutionary Dynamics of Duplicated Paralogous Adh Loci in Allotetraploid Cotton (Gossypium) Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2002; 19(5): 597 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Pollock, J. A. Eisen, N. A. Doggett, and M. P. Cummings A Case for Evolutionary Genomics and the Comprehensive Examination of Sequence Biodiversity Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2000; 17(12): 1776 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Small, J. A. Ryburn, R. C. Cronn, T. Seelanan, and J. F. Wendel The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group Am. J. Botany, September 1, 1998; 85(9): 1301 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Cummings and M. T. Clegg Nucleotide sequence diversity at the alcohol dehydrogenase 1 locus in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum): An evaluation of the background selection hypothesis PNAS, May 12, 1998; 95(10): 5637 - 5642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and Divergence in the Genomic Regions of High and Low Recombination in Self-Fertilizing and Cross-Fertilizing Aegilops Species Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 423 - 434.
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Clegg, M. P. Cummings, and M. L. Durbin The evolution of plant nuclear genes PNAS, July 22, 1997; 94(15): 7791 - 7798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Durbin, A. L. Denton, and M. T. Clegg Dynamics of mobile element activity in chalcone synthase loci in the common morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea) PNAS, April 24, 2001; 98(9): 5084 - 5089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|