The Journal of Heredity 2000:91(6)
© 2000 The American Genetic Association 91:480-483
Brief communication. Inheritance of resistance in smooth bromegrass to the crown rust fungus
Departments of 1Agronomy and 2Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA *Corresponding author E-mail: mdcasler@facstaff.wisc.edu
Common smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) is octoploid, 2n = 8x = 56, with a genome structure of AAAAB1B1B2B2. Tetrasomic inheritance patterns have been observed in smooth bromegrass, but disomic inheritance is also expected from cytologic observations. Smooth bromegrass is susceptible to the crown rust fungus (Puccinia coronata Corda.). The objective of this study was to determine the inheritance of smooth bromegrass resistance to P. coronata. Seven smooth bromegrass clones, three susceptible and four resistant, were selfed and crossed in a diallel with bulked reciprocals. Inoculations were made with a population of P. coronata from PL-BDR1 smooth bromegrass. Resistance of smooth bromegrass to this population of P. coronata is complex. At least three genes appear to be involved in this host-pathogen interaction, one tetrasomic dominant gene which determines susceptibility (S) and two dominant genes (R1 and R2) that may be complementary and could be inherited either tetrasomically or disomically. Other genes may be involved in the smooth bromegrass-P. coronata interaction, possibly accounting for the lack of fit to expected ratios of some progeny. Heterogeneity for avirulence phenotype in the pathogen population may also have contributed to lack of fit of some progeny. Multiple resistance genes were detected because a pathogen population, likely consisting of genotypes with different genes for virulence, was used to challenge the host.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Casler, M. Diaby, and C. Stendal Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression for Forage Yield and Fiber Concentration in Smooth Bromegrass Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 44 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
