Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bentzen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bentzen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 2001:92(3)
© 2001 The American Genetic Association 92:243-247

The Aunt and Uncle Effect: An Empirical Evaluation of the Confounding Influence of Full Sibs of Parents on Pedigree Reconstruction

J. B. Olsen, C. Busack, J. Britt, and P. Bentzen

From the Gene Conservation Laboratory, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 333 Raspberry Rd., Anchorage, AK, 99518-1599 (Olsen), Marine Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Olsen, Britt, and Bentzen), and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington (Busack). J. Britt is currently at the Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.

Address correspondence to Jeffrey B. Olsen at the address above or e-mail: jeff_olsen{at}fishgame.state.ak.us.

This study used simulations and a known two-generation pedigree of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to evaluate the effect of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction. Parentage analysis was conducted on 100 parent pair-offspring relationships from pedigrees with unrelated (simulation) and related (chinook salmon) candidate parents. Parentage assignment success for the chinook salmon was lower than in the simulated populations. For example, the six most variable loci (mean HE = 0.87) provided a mean of 97% unambiguous assignments in the simulated population and 67% unambiguous assignments for the chinook salmon. Estimates of the pairwise relatedness coefficient (xy) for most nonexcluded false parents and true parents of chinook salmon offspring exceeded 0.50. These results support the conclusion that closely related candidate parents decrease the power of genetic markers for pedigree reconstruction based on exclusion. Ambiguous parentage may be resolved using single parent- and parent pair-offspring likelihood analysis, however, these methods should be used with caution and they are not replacements for using more loci when many candidate parents are full sibs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
M. J. Ford and K. S. Williamson
The Aunt and Uncle Effect Revisited--The Effect of Biased Parentage Assignment on Fitness Estimation in a Supplemented Salmon Population
J. Hered., August 10, 2009; (2009) esp068v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. Iossa, C. D. Soulsbury, P. J. Baker, K. J. Edwards, and S. Harris
Behavioral changes associated with a population density decline in the facultatively social red fox
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 385 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. C. Anderson and J. C. Garza
The Power of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Large-Scale Parentage Inference
Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2567 - 2582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.