Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thórsson, AeH. Th.
Right arrow Articles by Anamthawat-Jónsson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thórsson, AeH. Th.
Right arrow Articles by Anamthawat-Jónsson, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 2001:92(5)
© 2001 The American Genetic Association 92:404-408

Morphological, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Evidence for Introgressive Hybridization in Birch

ÆH. Th. Thórsson, E. Salmela, and K. Anamthawat-Jónsson

From the Department of Biology, University of Iceland, Grensásvegi 12, Reykjavík 108, Iceland (Thórsson and Anamthawat-Jónsson), and Department of Biology, Ecology Section, University of Turku, Turku, 20014 Finland (Salmela).

Address correspondence to K. Anamthawat-Jónsson at the address above or e-mail kesara{at}hi.is.

Extensive morphological variation of tetraploid birch (Betula pubescens) in Iceland is believed to be due to gene flow from diploid dwarf birch (B. nana) by means of introgressive hybridization. A combined morphological and cytogenetic approach was used to investigate this phenomenon in two geographically separated populations of natural birch woodland in Iceland. The results not only confirmed introgressive hybridization in birch, but also revealed bidirectional gene flow between the two species via triploid interspecific hybrids. The populations showed continuous morphological variation connecting the species, but karyotypically they consisted of only three types of plants: diploids, triploids, and tetraploids. No aneuploids were found. Some of the tetraploid plants had B. pubescens morphology as expected, but most of them had intermediate characters. Most of the diploid plants were B. nana, but some were intermediates and a few had B. pubescens morphology. The triploid plants were either intermediates or they resembled one of the two species. Similar introgressive variation was observed among the diploid and triploid progeny of open-pollinated B. nana in a garden. Birch samples including field plants and artificial hybrids were further examined using a molecular method based on genomic Southern hybridization. The experiments verified introgression at the DNA level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. S. Kubatko
Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 478 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Ae. Th. Thorsson, S. Palsson, A. Sigurgeirsson, and K. Anamthawat-Jonsson
Morphological Variation among Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their Triploid Hybrids in Iceland
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2007; 99(6): 1183 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. Jarvinen, A. Palme, L. Orlando Morales, M. Lannenpaa, M. Keinanen, T. Sopanen, and M. Lascoux
Phylogenetic relationships of Betula species (Betulaceae) based on nuclear ADH and chloroplast matK sequences
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2004; 91(11): 1834 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.