Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reece, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reece, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, S. K., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Heredity 2004:95(4):346-352
© 2004 The American Genetic Association


Brief Communication

Microsatellite Marker Development and Analysis in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica): Confirmation of Null Alleles and Non-Mendelian Segregation Ratios

K. S. Reece, W. L. Ribeiro, P. M. Gaffney, R. B. Carnegie, and S. K. Allen, Jr

From the Aquaculture Genetics and Breeding Technology Center, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 (Reece, Ribeiro, Carnegie, and Allen); and College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958 (Gaffney).

Address correspondence to Kimberly S. Reece at the address above, or e-mail: kreece{at}vims.edu.

Eighteen microsatellite markers were developed for the Crassostrea virginica nuclear genome, including di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite repeat regions that included perfect, imperfect, and compound repeat sequences. A reference panel with DNA from the parents and four progeny of 10 full-sib families was used for a preliminary confirmation of polymorphism at these loci and indications of null alleles. Null alleles were discovered at three loci; in two instances, primer redesign enabled their amplification. Two to five representative alleles from each locus were sequenced to ensure that the targeted loci were amplifying. The sequence analysis revealed not only variation in the number of simple sequence repeat units, but also polymorphisms in the microsatellite flanking regions. A total of 3626 bp of combined microsatellite flanking region from the 18 loci was examined, revealing indels as well as nucleotide site substitutions. Overall, 16 indels and 146 substitutions were found with an average of 4.5% polymorphism across all loci. Eight markers were tested on the parents and 39–61 progeny from each of four families for examination of allelic inheritance patterns and genotypic ratios. Twenty-six tests of segregation ratios revealed eight significant departures from expected Mendelian ratios, three of which remained significant after correction for multiple tests. Deviations were observed in both the directions of heterozygote excess and deficiency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Pernet, R. Tremblay, I. Redjah, J.-M. Sevigny, and C. Gionet
Physiological and biochemical traits correlate with differences in growth rate and temperature adaptation among groups of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica
J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): 969 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
J. L. Petersen, A. M. Ibarra, J. L. Ramirez, and B. May
An Induced Mass Spawn of the Hermaphroditic Lion-Paw Scallop, Nodipecten subnodosus: Genetic Assignment of Maternal and Paternal Parentage
J. Hered., March 11, 2008; (2008) esn012v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
C. G. Rose, K. T. Paynter, and M. P. Hare
Isolation by Distance in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in Chesapeake Bay
J. Hered., March 1, 2006; 97(2): 158 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.