Skip Navigation


Journal of Heredity Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2005
Journal of Heredity 2005 96(4):368-375; doi:10.1093/jhered/esi039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/368    most recent
esi039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kleunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritland, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kleunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritland, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Estimating Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations with Marker-Based Methods: An Experimental Test in Mimulus guttatus

M. van Kleunen, and K. Ritland

From the Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

Address correspondence to Mark van Kleunen, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Villa Liegnitz, Lennéstr. 7a, D-14471 Potsdam, Germany, or e-mail vkleunen{at}rz.uni-potsdam.de, kermit.ritland{at}ubc.ca.

The calculation of heritabilities and genetic correlations, which are necessary for predicting evolutionary responses, requires knowledge about the relatedness between individuals. This information is often not directly available, especially not for natural populations, but can be inferred by using molecular markers such as allozymes. Several methods based on inferred relatedness from marker data have been developed to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations in natural populations. Most methods use maximum-likelihood procedures to assign pairs or groups of individuals to predefined discrete relatedness classes (e.g., half sibs and unrelated individuals). The Ritland method, on the other hand, uses method of moments estimators to estimate pairwise relatedness among individuals as continuous values. We tested both the Ritland method and a maximum-likelihood method by applying them to a greenhouse population consisting of seed families of the herb Mimulus guttatus and comparing the results to the ones from a frequently used standard method based on half-sib families. Estimates of genetic correlations were far from accurate, especially when we used the Ritland method. However, this study shows that even with a few variable allozyme loci, it is possible to get qualitatively good indications about the presence of heritable genetic variation from marker-based methods, even though both methods underestimated it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
F. D Frentiu, S. M Clegg, J. Chittock, T. Burke, M. W Blows, and I. P.F Owens
Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded
Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2008; 275(1635): 639 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
T. Shikano
Estimation of Quantitative Genetic Parameters Using Marker-Inferred Relatedness in Japanese Flounder: A Case Study of Upward Bias
J. Hered., March 1, 2008; 99(2): 94 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.