Skip Navigation


Journal of Heredity Advance Access originally published online on January 17, 2007
Journal of Heredity 2007 98(2):123-135; doi:10.1093/jhered/esl062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/123    most recent
esl062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moyle, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moyle, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2007. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Symposium Articles

Comparative Genetics of Potential Prezygotic and Postzygotic Isolating Barriers in a Lycopersicon Species Cross

Leonie C. Moyle

From the Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405

Address correspondence to L. C. Moyle at the address above, or e-mail: lmoyle{at}indiana.edu.

I compare the genetic basis of quantitative traits that potentially contribute to pre- and postzygotic isolation between the plant species Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum) and Solanum habrochaites (formerly Lycopersicon hirsutum), using quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in a set of near-isogenic lines. Putative prezygotic isolating traits include flower size, flower shape, stigma exsertion, and inflorescence length, that can influence pollinator preferences and/or selfing rates, and therefore gene flow between divergent types. Postzygotic isolating traits are hybrid pollen and seed sterility. Three substantive results emerge from these analyses. First, the genetic basis of floral differentiation appears to be somewhat less complex than the genetic basis of postzygotic hybrid sterility, although these differences are very modest. Second, there is little evidence that traits for floral differentiation are causally or mechanistically associated with hybrid sterility traits in this species cross. Third, there is little evidence that hybrid sterility QTL are more frequently associated with chromosomal centromeric regions, in comparison to floral trait QTL, a prediction of centromeric drive models of hybrid sterility. Although genome-wide associations are not evident in this analysis, several individual chromosomal regions that contain clusters of QTL for both floral and sterility traits, or that indicate hybrid sterility effects at centromere locations, warrant further fine-scale investigation.

Corresponding Editor: Loren Rieseberg


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. B Lowry, J. L Modliszewski, K. M Wright, C. A Wu, and J. H Willis
The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants
Phil Trans R Soc B, September 27, 2008; 363(1506): 3009 - 3021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. C. Moyle and T. Nakazato
Comparative Genetics of Hybrid Incompatibility: Sterility in Two Solanum Species Crosses
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1437 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.