Skip Navigation



Journal of Heredity Advance Access published online on November 4, 2008
Journal of Heredity, doi:10.1093/jhered/esn095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/197    most recent
esn095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sefc, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Koblmüller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sefc, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Koblmüller, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2008. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Assessing Parent Numbers from Offspring Genotypes: The Importance of Marker Polymorphism

Kristina M. Sefc, and Stephan Koblmüller

From the Department of Zoology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria (Sefc); the Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden (Koblmüller)

Address correspondence to K. M. Sefc at the address above, or e-mail: kristina.sefc{at}uni-graz.at.

Methods to infer parent numbers from offspring genotypes either determine the minimum number of parents required to explain alleles and multilocus genotypes detected in the offspring or use models to incorporate information on population allele frequencies and allele segregation. Disparate results by different approaches suggest that one or perhaps all methods are subject to bias. Here, we investigate the performance of minimum parent number estimates, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses (programs COLONY and PARENTAGE) with respect to marker information content in simulated data sets without knowledge of parental genotypes. Offspring families of different sizes were assumed to share one parent and to be sired by 1 or 5 additional parents. All methods committed large errors in terms of underestimation (minimum value) and overestimation (COLONY), or both (PARENTAGE) of parent numbers, unless the data were highly informative, and their relative performances depended on full-sib group sizes and sire numbers. Increasing the number of markers with low gene diversity (He ≤ 0.68) yielded only slow improvement of the results, but all 3 methods performed well with 5–7 markers of He = 0.84. We emphasize the importance of high marker polymorphism for inferring parent numbers and individual parent contributions, as well as for the detection of monogamous reproduction.

Key Words: GERUD • monogamy • multiple mating • parentage • paternity

Corresponding Editor: Howard Ross

Received May 20, 2008
Revised September 24, 2008
Accepted October 2, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.