The Journal of Heredity 2002:93(1)
© 2002 The American Genetic Association 93:73-76
Brief Communication |
Testing Homology of Loci for Two Plumage Colors, "lavender" and "recessive white," With Chicken and Japanese Quail Hybrids
From the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Génétique Factorielle, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France (Minvielle and Monvoisin) and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Expérimentale de Génétique Avicole, Nouzilly, France (Gourichon).
Address correspondence to Dr. Francis Minvielle at the address above or e-mail: minvielle{at}dga2.jouy.inra.fr.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Homology for two plumage color loci was studied by hybridization between chickens and Japanese quail. First, chicken-quail hybrids were produced from homozygous "lavender" chicken cocks and "bleu" Japanese quail, and all 30 hybrids had the same parental slaty blue plumage color. On the other hand, no hybrids with this plumage were obtained out of 18 progeny from the same cocks and wild-type quail. These results show that the slaty blue plumage color is determined by homologous loci in Japanese quail and chickens. Second, all (n = 25) chicken-quail hybrids hatched from homozygous "recessive white" cocks and "recessive white" (n = 8) or "wild-type" (n = 17) quail had the same pattern of plumage color, with white feathers on the ventral face and colored feathers elsewhere. These results indicate that the recessive white mutations are not homologous in Japanese quail and chickens.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chickens and Japanese quail belong to the same family, the Phasianidae (Mason 1984). Interspecific cross is possible between chickens and Japanese quail, producing sterile chicken-quail hybrids in low frequency (Damme 1991; Ogasawara and Huang 1963; Silversides and Mérat 1991; Takashima and Mizuma 1981; Wilcox and Clark 1961), but the reciprocal cross to obtain quail-chicken hybrids was never successful (Mitsumoto and Nishida 1958; Sarvella and Marks 1970). Consequently the artificial insemination of quail with semen from cocks provides a simple way for testing homologies between loci with visible effect, like plumage color. Homologies between loci may be anticipated by comparing plumage color and mode of inheritance, and confirmed by observing phenotypes of chicken-quail sterile hybrids. This approach was used for the first time with avian species by Silversides and Mérat (1991), who established the homology of the AL locus in the chicken and in the Japanese quail.
In chickens, the "lavender" phenotype is due to an autosomal recessive mutation, LAV*L, at the LAV locus (Brumbaugh et al. 1972). Plumage color of homozygous birds varies from slaty blue to beige depending on the relative abundance of eumelanin and pheomelanin in the feathers (Somes 1988). At first the cause for this dilution of plumage color appeared to be related to the presence of melanocytes with abnormal dendrite formation in the "lavender" chicken (Brumbaugh et al. 1972), because in the mouse, a similar color mutation, "leaden," was associated with fewer and thinner dendrites in melanocytes (Markert and Silvers 1956). However, later works indicated that dendrites were present in melanocytes of lavender chickens (Mayerson and Brumbaugh 1981), and that the site of action of the mutation in the mouse was in the melanocytes (Stephenson et al. 1985). Similar dilutions of feather color determined by recessive mutations were reported by Jaap and Milby (1944) in the turkey ("recessive slate"), by Levi (1957) in the pigeon ("milky"), by Hollander and Walther (1962) in the muscovy duck ("lavender"), and by Somes (1988) in the Japanese quail ("bleu").
Recessive white feathering in the chicken (Bateson and Punnett 1906) and in the turkey (Robertson et al. 1943) is due to a mutation that prevents the expression of feather color by other loci. The albino mutation (C*A) at the multiallelic "recessive white" locus C in the chicken is caused by a deletion at a copper-binding site of the tyrosinase gene (Tobita-Teramoto et al. 2000). Corresponding biochemical defects for the C*C allele (recessive allele for white plumage and pigmented eyes) have not yet been reported. A similar recessive mutation with a less complete expression (dark eyes and white feathering except for some colored feathers on the top of the head and on the back) has been reported in Japanese quail (Roberts et al. 1978).
The purpose of the present work was to test the possible homologies between loci for "lavender" chickens and "bleu" quail, and for "recessive white" chickens and quail by crossing male chickens and female quail homozygous for the corresponding recessive alleles.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We maintain a gene pool with small numbers of LAV*L/LAV*L and of C*C/C*C chickens and pure line stocks of "bleu" and "recessive white" Japanese quail at our INRA experimental unit in Nouzilly, France. Both quail stocks were started from single mutant birds which appeared spontaneously in the quail colony, and after initial crossing and backcrossing to the mutant parent, they were fixed for each mutation. To minimize inbreeding, each mutant line was crossed to a wild-type plumage quail line twice in the past 10 years, and all (about 200 per stock) F1 birds had wild-type plumage. Birds with the mutant phenotype obtained in the following F2 generation were then kept as parents of the mutant stock which bred true thereafter. Consequently recessiveness of the two mutations is well established. Visual comparison of "bleu" quail and "lavender" chickens in our experimental unit indicated that their plumage color was quite similar. On the other hand, eye pigmentation and mode of inheritance of our "recessive white" Japanese quail corresponded closely to those of C*C/C*C chickens, whereas the white plumage retained a few normally pigmented feathers in the quail but not in the chickens.
Mixed sperm from 8 to 10 LAV*L/LAV*L cocks (Figure 1A) was used to inseminate 32 "bleu" (Figure 1B) and 8 "wild-type" (control) Japanese quail. Several cocks also had a naked neck, a trait determined by a semidominant autosomal mutation (Somes 1990). Mixed sperm from 4 C*C/C*C cocks was used to inseminate 16 "recessive white" (Figure 2 A,B) and 16 "wild-type" (control) Japanese quail. Each quail was inseminated twice a week, repeated 2-week egg collections were carried out, and successive hatches were obtained. Eggs were candled at 13 days, and unhatched eggs at 20 days of incubation were opened to allow classification of down color.
|
|
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At hatching, hybrid chicks were the size of quail chicks, but they had stronger chicken-like legs and were much more active. After a few days they were already outgrowing contemporary quail and showing a more erect chicken-like posture.
"Lavender" and "Bleu"
The results of the hybrid crosses are shown in Table 1. All 30 hybrids obtained from "bleu" quail had the lavender/bleu plumage color, with some variation of intensity (Figure 1C,D). Incidentally, 17 of them were also "naked neck" (Figure 1C). On the other hand, none of the 18 hybrids obtained from "wild-type" quail had the lavender/bleu phenotype: their plumage had various proportions of black, wild-type quail, and white feathers, and six of them were "naked neck." These results show that the same gene determines the lavender and bleu phenotypes, because both mutations must be present in the hybrid to obtain the mutant plumage color. Since LAV*L was first used in chickens, and because this is the first report to show homology at this locus between the two species, it is proposed that the name "lavender" and symbol LAV*L be used in both species.
|
"Recessive White"
The results of the hybrid crosses are shown in Table 2. All 25 hybrids, whether they were hatched from "wild-type" or "recessive white" quail, had the same pattern of plumage color, with wild-type quail feathers on the back, head, and wings, and white feathers on the ventral surface (Figure 2C,D). No "recessive white" hybrid was obtained. These results show that the "recessive white" phenotype is determined by different mutations in Japanese quail and in chickens. Since the name "recessive white" was given for chickens (Somes 1988) first, the white plumage phenotype of the Japanese quail and its corresponding mutation should be given specific names. We propose "white plumage" and WHI*W. The fact that "recessive white" chickens have no pigmented feathers (Smyth 1990), whereas their quail counterparts always have a few normally pigmented ones somewhere on their back from the head to the pelvic area (Cheng and Kimura 1990), was already an indication of this difference. The uniform white ventral plumage of all hybrids sired by "recessive white" cocks showed that the recessive chicken mutation C*C was somewhat expressed in the hybrid, although it was present in a single dose. This phenotype is analogous to that of the tuxedo quail (white feathers on the ventral face and brown feathers elsewhere), which is heterozygous at the Japanese quail recessive white locus and homozygous EB*E/EB*E for the mutant allele *E at the "extended brown" locus EB* (Cheng and Kimura 1990). A similar pattern of white plumage color was observed also in heterozygous guinea fowl obtained by crossing a pigmented line with a homozygous white line (Cauchard 1971). In all three instances the pattern of white feathers on the ventral face of the bird was associated with the heterozygous state of a "recessive white" locus.
|
This work has confirmed that hybridization is an appropriate tool to study homology in chickens and Japanese quail for genes with visible effects.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We would like to thank Chantal Moussu for taking care of the experimental animals, all the staff of the Unité Expérimentale de Génétique Avicole in Nouzilly for artificial insemination of quail, and Gérard Coquerelle for providing lavender cocks. Figures were prepared by Marc Weber from electronic files of photographs.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Corresponding Editor: Lyman Crittenden
Received June 13, 2001
Accepted September 20, 2001
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-
Bateson W and Punnett RC, 1906. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Poult Rep Evol Comm R Soc 3:1130.
Brumbaugh JA, Chatterjee G, and Hollander WF, 1972. Adendritic melanocytes: a mutation in linkage group II of the fowl. J Hered 63:1925.
Cauchard JC, 1971. La Pintade (Numida meleagris). Uzès: Editions Henri Peladan.
Cheng KM and Kimura M, 1990. Mutations and major variants in Japanese quail. In: Poultry breeding and genetics (Crawford RD, ed). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 333361.
Damme K, 1991. Gattungskreuzung zwischen dem Haushuhn (Gallus domesticus) und der Wachtel (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arch Geflügelk 55:127129.
Hollander WF and Walther FP, 1962. Recessive "lavender" in the Muscovy duck. J Hered 53:8183.
Jaap RG and Milby TT, 1944. Comparative genetics of blue plumage in poultry. Poult Sci 23:38.
Levi WM, 1957. The pigeon. Sumter, SC: Levi Publishing.
Markert CL and Silvers WK, 1956. The effects of genotype and cell environment on melanoblast differentiation in the house mouse. Genetics 41:429450.
Mason IL, 1984. Evolution of domesticated animals. London: Longman.
Mayerson PL and Brumbaugh JA, 1981. Lavender, a chick melanocyte mutant with defective melanosome translocation: a possible role for 10 nm filaments and microfilaments but not microtubules. J Cell Sci 51:2551.[Abstract]
Mitsumoto K and Nishida S, 1958. Trials of production of the hybrid between quail and chickens. Jpn J Zool Sci 29:10.
Ogasawara FX and Huang R, 1963. A modified method of artificial insemination in the production of chicken-quail hybrids. Poult Sci 42:13861392.[ISI]
Roberts CW, Fulton JE, and Barnes CR, 1978. Genetics of white-breasted, white and brown colors and descriptions of feather patterns in Japanese quail. Can J Genet Cytol 20:18.
Robertson WRB, Bohren BB, and Warren DC, 1943. The inheritance of plumage color in the turkey. J Hered 34:246256.
Sarvella P and Marks H, 1970. Attempts to obtain quail x chicken hybrids. Poult Sci 49:11761178.
Silversides FG and Mérat P, 1991. Homology of the s+ locus in the chicken with Al+ in the Japanese quail. J Hered 82:245247.
Smyth JR, 1990. Genetics of plumage, skin and eye pigmentation in chickens. In: Poultry breeding and genetics (Crawford RD, ed). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 109167.
Somes RG, 1988. International registry of poultry genetic stocks. Storrs: University of Connecticut Press.
Somes RG, 1990. Mutations and major variants of plumage and skin in chickens. In: Poultry breeding and genetics (Crawford RD, ed). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 169208.
Stephenson DA, Glenister PH, and Hornby JE, 1985. Site of beige (be) and leaden (ln) pigment gene expression determined by embryonic skin grafts and aggregation mouse chimaeras employing sash (Wsh) homozygotes. Genet Res 46:193205.[ISI][Medline]
Takashima Y and Mizuma Y, 1981. Studies on chicken-quail hybrids. Jpn Poult Sci 18:267272.
Tobita-Teramoto T, Jang GY, Kino K, Salter DW, Brumbaugh J, and Akiyama T, 2000. Autosomal albino chicken mutation (ca/ca) deletes hexanucleotide (-
GACTGG817) at a copper-binding site of the tyrosinase gene. Poult Sci 79:4650.
Wilcox FH and Clark CE, 1961. Chicken-quail hybrids. J Hered 52:167170.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Minvielle, D. Gourichon, S. Ito, M. Inoue-Murayama, and S. Riviere Effects of the Dominant Lethal Yellow Mutation on Reproduction, Growth, Feed Consumption, Body Temperature, and Body Composition of the Japanese Quail Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1646 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Minvielle, R. Grossmann, and D. Gourichon Development and Performances of a Japanese Quail Line Homozygous for the Diabetes Insipidus (di) Mutation Poult. Sci., February 1, 2007; 86(2): 249 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Minvielle, D. Gourichon, and J.-L. Monvoisin Effects of Two-Locus Combinations, Using the Roux, Lavender, and Beige Mutations, on Plumage Color of Japanese Quail J. Hered., November 1, 2003; 94(6): 517 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



