Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


The Journal of Heredity 2002:93(2)
© 2002 The American Genetic Association 93:130-132

Tests of Six Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Mutants for Association with Aneuploids

R. J. Kohel, D. M. Stelly, and J. Yu

From the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Crop Germplasm Research Unit, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845 (Kohel and Yu), and Texas A&M University, Soil Crop Science Department, College Station, TX 77843 (Stelly).

Address correspondence to R. J. Kohel at address above or e-mail: kohel{at}kapas.tamu.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Genetic mutants are useful tools for basic and applied research to elucidate the developmental and regulatory processes of the cotton plant (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Their value is enhanced with knowledge of their location in the genome. The results of aneuploid tests used to locate mutant loci on specific chromosomes in G. hirsutum L. are reported. Thirty-four monosomes and telosomes, representing 18 of the 26 chromosomes, were used in combination with six mutants that were associated with nine loci. The mutant loci were glandless stem and boll (gl1gl6), immature fiber (im), Ligon lintless-2 (Li2), methylation (me), nonpinking (np1np2), and Raimondal (Ra1Ra2). We found that im was associated with chromosome 3 that contains linkage group VI (accessory involucre and frego bract); Li2 was associated with chromosome 18 that contains linkage group XVI (open bud and yellow pollen-2); and me was associated with chromosome 9. The remaining three mutants were not associated with the aneuploids in the tests. Knowledge of these chromosome assignments provides a valuable reference for specific studies of mutants and for further genome mapping efforts.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Crop genetics and breeding benefit from research on genetic mutants that qualitatively or quantitatively influence plant traits. The discovery or induction of mutants, as well as their characterizations, localization, and maintenance are important. Genetic and linkage analyses of mutants are part of the description process, and tend to be especially interesting in polyploid species such as cotton (e.g., Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium barbadense L.), due in part to genetic redundancy and intergenic complementation between homologous loci.

In G. hirsutum, hypoaneuploid (haplo) stocks provide an effective means to associate the gene loci with specific chromosomes (Endrizzi et al. 1985). The core collection of hypoaneuploid cytogenetic stocks includes monosomic and monotelodisomic types collectively affecting 19 of the 26 chromosomes (Stelly 1993). For most chromosomes, the genetic redundancy in the polyploid genome of G. hirsutum allows for sporophytic hemizygosity and transmission of hypoaneuploidy via the megagametophyte. Multiple-marker genetic linkage test stocks afford the opportunity to associate loci with existing genetic linkage groups. Although the cytogenetic testers provide incomplete genome coverage of the cotton genome, the tests are simple and usually unequivocal. We report herein the results of tests involving six morphological, pigmentation, and biochemical traits (nine loci).


    Description of Traits and Loci
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Glandless stem and boll (gl1) was first reported by McMichael (1954) as a single recessive gene mutation. Murray (1965) later recovered a variant determined to be gl1Gl6, and it was recognized that most cottons are recessive at the gl6 locus. So most tests of glandless stem and boll test only the gl1 locus. Tests of gl6 involve the use of a gl1Gl6 line. Tests in synthetic hybrids by Gerstel and Phillips (1958) suggested that gl1 is in the A subgenome.

Two of the loci affect fiber development. The immature fiber (im) mutation affects the seed-borne fibers as a simple recessive mutant (Kohel and McMichael 1990). Mutant plants are recognized by their nonfluffy cotton fiber resulting from extremely fine, low-micronaire fibers. Ligon lintless-2 (Li2) is a completely dominant single-gene mutation that has extremely short fibers, less than 10 mm (Narbuth and Kohel 1990).

The gene for methylation (me) increases methylation of terpenoid products in cotton. It was introduced into G. hirsutum from G. barbadense (Bell et al. 1994) and shown to be inherited as a simple recessive in G. hirsutum (Kohel and Bell 1999). Raimondal, which is a unique terpenoid form, was transferred from the 26-chromosome Peruvian species G. ramondii Ulb. (Bell et al. 1994; Stipanovic et al. 1994). Genetic analysis (Kohel and Bell 1999) determined that dominant genes at two loci (Ra1Ra2) acted epistatically to produce the Raimondal phenotype. Since the trait was transferred from a D-genome cotton, one or both of the loci are in the D subgenome of G. hirsutum.

Nonpinking was reported by Rhyne and Carter (1991) as a duplicate recessive mutant (np1np2). Mutant nonpinking plants lack anthocyanins, and they appear lighter green in color than normal cotton.

No linkages were found between these mutant loci and the markers with which they were tested (Percy and Kohel 1999). The mutant lines are maintained as isolines by backcrossing to the genetic standard for G. hirsutum, Texas Marker-1 (TM-1) (Kohel et al. 1970). The number of backcrosses to TM-1 varied among the lines.

The hypoaneuploid lines (Table 1) were from the living collection maintained at College Station, TX. Plants of known aneuploidy were used as females to create the initial test hybrids. Aneuploid segregates in F1 and F2 generations were recognized by phenotypic identification. Each type of monosomic and monotelodisomic aneuploid exhibits a characteristic chromosome-specific phenotypic syndrome (Endrizzi et al. 1985). As in the case of the mutant lines, the aneuploids are maintained in a standard isogenic background by crossing to TM-1, with various numbers of prior backcrosses to TM-1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Segregation of mutants and aneuploids in cotton

 

    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Seeds of each population were sown in peat pellets and germinated under spring greenhouse conditions at College Station, TX. While in the greenhouse, seedlings were scored for any expression of the mutant or aneuploid phenotype. At 3 weeks of age, the greenhouse-grown seedlings were transplanted to field plots. Plots consisted of rows with 0.5 m spacing between plants within rows and 1.0 m spacing between rows. This procedure requires fewer seeds, which is important when studying mutants of low productivity, and it allows the observation of phenotypic expression of individual plants free of stress and competition.

Tests were conducted in 1991–1998. Crosses were made with the hypoaneuploid plant as the female parent and the mutant line as the male parent. Transmission of the deficiency through the egg is reduced, and it is essentially zero through the pollen. Selection of the hypoaneuploid F1 hybrid plants was based on morphological features. All the tests reported in Table 1 consist of F2 progeny of haplo F1 plants, except for the cross involving me, in which only segregation in F1 progenies from monosome x mutant are reported

Most simple recessive mutants, such as me and im, are expected to express the recessive phenotype when hemizygous because of the F1 haplo state, which is deficient for the respective homologous chromosome (White and Endrizzi 1965). For simple recessive and dominant mutants associated with a given chromosome deficiency, all F2 progeny from the haplo F1 would be expected to be uniformly mutant in phenotype. Similarly the gl1gl6 glandless phenotype would expectedly occur in the gl1 hemizygous haplo F1 (gl10gl6gl6), because most cottons are Gl1Gl1gl6gl6 and segregation is only at the gl1 locus. All F2 progeny from gl1 hemizygous haplo F1 plants would be glandless stem and glandless boll if both parents were gl6gl6. If the aneuploid was Gl1Gl1Gl60, the association of gl1 could still be determined. The genotype gl1gl1Gl6- has a phenotype with reduced stem glanding, whereas Gl1gl1Gl6- has normal glanding, so the association of gl1 with the deficiency could still be determined in the phenotypes of the haplo F1 (gl10Gl6gl6) and their segregating F2 progeny. The Gl6 allele was introduced to test for its location. The test for association of Gl6 in the F2 progeny from haplo F1 (Gl1gl1Gl60) from the cross of Gl1Gl1gl60 with gl1gl1Gl6Gl6 would be 3:1 glanded versus reduced glands (no glandless) when associated and 15:1 glanded versus glandless with independence. In the case of dominant duplicate factors controlling Raimondal (Ra1Ra2), a locus associated with the deficiency in the F2 would be indicated by a 3:1 (mutant to wild type) versus a 9:7 segregation for independence. The duplicate recessive nonpinking (np1np2) would segregate wild type to mutant 3:1 with association and 15:1 with independence in the F2.


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The cytogenetic tests revealed chromosomal locations of all three of the simply inherited mutants, me, im, and Li2, but none of the six duplicate-factor loci (Table 1). The association of the recessive me with chromosome 9 (H9) was detected by the occurrence of mutant plants in the F1 generation. In the first population grown (n = 23), only one plant was scored as abnormal with the phenotypes of both me and H9. Cytological analysis revealed that it had 24 chromosome pairs and 2 fragments. Meiotic products deficient for arm 9-long that arise from H9 and monotelodisomic 9-short plants are mitotically unstable, and thus H9 plants produce additional chromosome aberrations (Myles and Endrizzi 1989). In the second F1 population (n = 32), two me plants were verified with the H9 phenotype and cytotype (25 chromosome pairs and 1 univalent). None of the F1 produced viable F2 seed. Chromosome 9 bears 5S and 18S–28S rRNA tandem gene clusters, and several cytogenetic lines bear chromosome 9 translocation breakpoints, but me is the first morphological/biochemical marker associated with chromosome 9.

The mutant im was associated with chromosome 3 (H3) when the F2 was uniformly of the im phenotype. The im mutant phenotype was not scored in the F1 because H3 has reduced fiber development that masked and confounded the immature phenotype. Chromosome 3 contains linkage group VI with markers accessory involucre and frego bract (ia and fg).

The dominant Li2 was associated with chromosome 18 (H18) by uniform mutant expression in the F2. The Li2 mutant is completely dominant, so all the F1 plants expressed the mutant phenotype. A prominent feature of H18 is short, dense fibers (Endrizzi et al. 1985), so it might be expected that this chromosome bears genes that control fiber development. Chromosome 18 contains linkage group XVI [open bud (ob) and Yellow pollen-2 (Y2)], but linkage tests of Li2 and ob showed no significant linkage (Narbuth and Kohel 1990).

The duplicate factor mutants, Raimondal, nonpinking, and glandless stem and boll, did not reveal any indication of an association with the aneuploid lines. As an introgressed mutant, Raimondal, was not a productive line, and some populations were too small to be statistically robust, specifically the tests for H2 and Te5lo that involved the A genome, but they were not repeated for this D genome introgressed mutant. In previous tests of gl1, it was found independent of chromosomes 4, 6, 7, and 12 (Kohel 1978).

We have assigned chromosome locations to three mutants and at least narrowed the potential locations for the remaining three that we tested. This information will enhance the mutants value in genetic experiments and in mapping efforts.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dwaine Raska for analysis of the monosome 9 plants.


    Footnotes
 
Corresponding Editor: Prem P. Jauhar

Received March 9, 2001
Accepted December 31, 2001


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Description of Traits and...
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 

    Bell AA, Stipanovic RD, Mace ME, and Kohel RJ, 1994. Genetic resistance. In: Genetic metabolism. Vol. 28: Recent advances in phytochemistry (Ellis BE and Stafford HA, eds). New York: Plenum Press; 231–249.

    Endrizzi JE, Turcotte EL, and Kohel RJ, 1985. Genetics, cytology, and evolution of Gossypium. Adv Genet 23:271–375.

    Gerstel DU and Phillips LL, 1958. Segregation of synthetic amphiploids in Gossypium and Nicotiana. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 13:225–237.

    Kohel RJ, 1978. Monosome analysis of cotton mutants. J Hered 69:275–276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kohel RJ and Bell AA, 1999. Genetic analysis of two terpenoid variants in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Hered 90:249–251.[Free Full Text]

    Kohel RJ and McMichael SC, 1990. Immature fiber mutant of upland cotton. Crop Sci 30:419–421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kohel RJ, Richmond TR, and Lewis CF, 1970. Texas Marker-1. A description of a genetic standard for Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 10:670–671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    McMichael SC, 1954. Glandless boll in upland cotton and its use in the study of natural crossing. Agron J 46:527–528.[Free Full Text]

    Murray JC, 1965. A new locus for glanded stem in tetraploid cotton. J Hered 56:42–44.[Free Full Text]

    Myles EL Jr and Endrizzi JE, 1989. Aneuploids induced by deficiencies of chromosome 9 and analysis of the time of nondisjunction in cotton. Genome 32:12–18.

    Narbuth EV and Kohel RJ, 1990. Inheritance and linkage analysis of a new fiber mutant in cotton. J Hered 81:131–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Percy RG and Kohel RJ, 1999. Qualitative genetics. In: Cotton (Smith CW and Cothren JT, eds). New York: Wiley; 319–360.

    Rhyne CL and Carter JC, 1991. Anthocyaninless cotton. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production and Research Conference, San Antonio, TX, January 8–12, 1991 (Herver DJ and Richter DA, eds). Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council America; 540–541.

    Stelly DM, 1993. Interfacing cytogenetics with the cotton genomic mapping effort. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production and Research Conference, New Orleans, LA, January 10–14, 1993 (Herver DJ and Richter DA, eds). Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council America; 1545–1550.

    Stipanovic RD, Kim H, Altman DW, Bell AA, and Kohel RJ, 1994. Raimondalone, a sesquiterpene from a cotton interspecific hybrid. Phytochemistry 36:953–956.[CrossRef][ISI]

    White TG and Endrizzi JE, 1965. Tests for the association of marker loci with chromosomes in Gossypium hirsutum by the use of aneuploids. Genetics 51:605–612.[Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Rong, F. A. Feltus, V. N. Waghmare, G. J. Pierce, P. W. Chee, X. Draye, Y. Saranga, R. J. Wright, T. A. Wilkins, O. L. May, et al.
Meta-analysis of Polyploid Cotton QTL Shows Unequal Contributions of Subgenomes to a Complex Network of Genes and Gene Clusters Implicated in Lint Fiber Development
Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2577 - 2588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?