Journal of Heredity Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2005
Journal of Heredity 2005 96(4):434-440; doi:10.1093/jhered/esi043
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief Communication |
Assessing Genetic Diversity in Clonal Organisms: Low Diversity or Low Resolution? Combining Power and Cost Efficiency in Selecting Markers
From CCMAR, CIMARLaboratório Associado, FCMA- Univ. Algarve, Gambelas, P-8005-139, Faro, Portugal (Arnaud-Haond, Alberto, Teixeira, and Serrão); Instituto Mediterraneo de Estudios Avanzados, CSIC-Univ. Illes Balears, C/ Miquel Marques 21, 07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Spain (Duarte); and Stazione Zoologica "A. Dohrn," Laboratorio di Ecologia del Benthos, 80077 Ischia, Naples, Italy (Procaccini)
Address correspondence to S. Arnaud-Haond at the address above, or e-mail: sarnaud{at}ualg.pt or eserrao{at}ualg.pt.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The increasing use of molecular tools to study populations of clonal organisms leads us to question whether the low polymorphism found in many studies reflects limited genetic diversity in populations or the limitations of the markers used. Here we used microsatellite datasets for two sea grass species to provide a combinatory statistic, combined with a likelihood approach to estimate the probability of identical multilocus genotypes (MLGs) to be shared by distinct individuals, in order to ascertain the efficiency of the markers used and to optimize cost-efficiently the choice of markers to use for deriving unbiased estimates of genetic diversity. These results strongly indicate that conclusions from studies on clonal organisms derived using markers showing low polymorphism, including microsatellites, should be reassessed using appropriate polymorphic markers.
The development of molecular techniques over the last decade has provided new tools to examine genetic variability within and among populations (Avise 1989, 1994; Parker et al. 1998; Sunnucks 2000). However, the efficient use of new molecular techniques often lags behind their accelerating development (Parker et al. 1998). In a variety of cases, conclusions previously drawn from the first markers used, commonly allozymes or random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), have been significantly revised in light of results obtained using new markers, either due to evidence for selection on some markers, or to very low levels of variability limiting their ability to estimate population parameters (Beaumont and Pether 1996; Charlesworth 1998; Lemaire et al. 2000; Parker et al. 1998; Pogson et al. 1995).
Limited marker resolution becomes even more critical when studying clonal organisms for which multilocus genotypes are the only way to discriminate genetically distinct individuals, such as plants or bacteria (Hagen and Hamrick 1996; Hamrick and Godt 1989). Aquatic plants, many of which are highly clonal, are particularly prone to erroneous inferences on the genetic structure of their populations derived from the use of low-power markers. Indeed, initial evidence based on allozymes indicated widespread genetic monomorphism in submerged plants (Barrett et al. 1993), suggesting a much larger role for clonal than for sexual propagation. However, subsequent research using more powerful markers provided evidence of a wider range of clonal diversity, from apparently monoclonal meadows (Waycott et al. 1996) to multiclonal and highly genetically diverse ones (Alberte et al. 1994; Laushman 1993; Reusch et al. 2000; Waycott 1995).
Very low levels of genetic variability have been reported for the Mediterranean sea grass Posidonia oceanica, inferred to be highly clonal, both when using allozymes (Capiomont et al. 1996) and RAPD markers (Procaccini et al. 1996; Procaccini and Mazzella 1996). The recent application of new RAPD primers (Jover et al. 2003) and of tri- and heptanucleotide microsatellites (Procaccini and Waycott 1998) revealed higher clonal diversity (Table 1 and Figure 1), suggesting that previous reports of low genetic variability were largely derived from the limited power of allozymes and of the first RAPD markers that were used. Yet the level of genetic variability revealed by those microsatellites remained low, still suggesting a predominance of clonal growth in the maintenance of natural populations (Procaccini et al. 2001). Recently developed dinucleotide microsatellites suggested a much higher level of clonal diversity in the P. oceanica meadow used to test for polymorphism (Alberto et al. 2003a). The increasing revelation of the genetic diversity of clonal organisms, as new tools are introduced, questions the extent to which inferences derived from any one marker type provide reliable accounts of the genetic diversity of these populations or reflect the limitations of these markers (Reusch 2001).
|
|
Here we propose a combined approach using both the exploration of all marker combinations and the likelihood probability of identical multilocus genotypes (MLGs) to be shared by distinct individuals to ascertain a priori the dependence of the estimates of genetic diversity of clonal organisms on the number and efficiency of the markers used. This approach can also be used to optimize, in terms of cost-efficiency, the choice of markers to derive unbiased estimates of genetic diversity of the clonal organism studied. We demonstrate this approach using microsatellite markers for two clonal sea grass species, P. oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa (Alberto et al. 2003a,b).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For P. oceanica, approximately 40 shoots were collected from each of eight localities (Table 2). A portion of each shoot was desiccated and preserved in silica crystals. For C. nodosa, 38 shoots were collected in patches in Alfacs Bay (northern Spain). A sample of 45 seedlings collected in Cadiz Bay was used as a control for marker power, since no clonal replicates are expected in seedlings.
|
Genomic DNA was isolated following the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1988). Samples from eight meadows of P. oceanica were fully genotyped for four trinucleotides, one 7-nucleotide (Procaccini and Waycott 1998), and eight dinucleotides (Alberto et al. 2003a) microsatellites. The samples of C. nodosa were genotyped for 12 dinucleotide microsatellites, as described in Alberto et al. (2003b).
The clonal or genotype diversity is often estimated as Pd = G/N, where G is the number of distinct genotypes identified and N is the number of shoots analyzed. However, for a monoclonal stand (i.e., with a single genotype), this index would indicate a different value of genotypic diversity depending on the sample size, and thus we chose to modify it slightly by using R = G 1/N 1, which will always be zero for a single clone stand and one for maximal genotypic diversity, when every sampled unit is a new genet (Dorken and Eckert 2001). The index maintains the same order of magnitude and can still be approximately compared with the "classical" Pd values reported in the literature, although care must still be taken when comparing values from studies using different sampling designs.
Genotypic diversity as revealed by any possible combinations of any number of the available markers was then computed in order to select the most "parsimonious" marker combination allowing efficient discrimination of genets. Submatrices were produced from the complete genotype matrix by selecting all combinations
of l from the L available loci (with 1
l
L and L = 5 for tri- and heptanucleotides, and L = 8 for dinucleotides). For each rank of l, the average genotypic diversity R was computed, as well as the standard error, and the combination of l loci revealing more distinct genotypes was retained. This exercise was performed using a routine written in C ("Gencount," available from F. Alberto upon request) on each population and both sets of markers (tri- + heptanucleotides, and dinucleotides). The curves describing the dependence of the average R (± SE) on l were drawn and compared. The minimal combination of l markers allowing the discrimination of the maximum MLGs with a satisfying likelihood probability was retained and compared among populations in order to find a minimal consensus combination allowing the discrimination of all MLGs in any population.
In addition, and to test whether all of the samples with identical genotypes belong to the same genet, we used the round-robin method (Parks and Werth 1993) to estimate allelic frequencies and genotype probabilities in each population. This subsampling approach avoids overestimation of rare allele frequencies by estimating the allelic frequencies for each locus on the basis of a sample pool composed of all the genotypes distinguished on the basis of all the loci, except the one being estimated. This procedure is repeated for all loci, and the unique genotype probability is then calculated as follows:
![]() |
![]() |
In order to evaluate the importance of somatic mutations, the frequency distribution of the number of different alleles between all pairs of MLGs was plotted for each population.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The analysis of clonal diversity performed on eight P. oceanica populations with four trinucleotide and one heptanucleotide nuclear microsatellites (Figure 2a) showed low levels of diversity ranging from 0.14 (Malta) to 0.23 (Formentera Illetas). Much higher diversity was revealed when using the same number (five) of dinucleotides (Figure 2b); the level of diversity ranged from 0.24 (Port Lligat) to 0.78 (Malta). With all eight dinucleotide loci, the variability was between 0.31 (Port Lligat) and 0.84 (Malta). In the same way, the number of alleles per locus was 3 with the septanucleotides, approximately 4 with trinucleotides, and 12.5 with dinucleotides.
|
For C. nodosa, all seedlings had different MLGs (Figure 2c) as expected, whereas lower clonal diversity of approximately 0.44 was observed for the northern Spain population. However, both samples reached the maximum clonal diversity with a minimum combination of four markers.
In all the P. oceanica samples, all identical genotypes identified with dinucleotides were estimated to have a probability of less than .01 of having originated from two or more distinct events of sexual reproduction (i.e., distinct genets), except for three genotype pairs from Paphos and Port Lligat (where .01 < Psex < .05), whereas this was not the case for tri- and heptanucleotide microsatellites. In all populations, some MLGs defined with these last markers showed a higher probability (Psex > .05), thus indicating that several distinct individuals may be included in the same MLG groups (data not shown). Indeed, this was confirmed by the discrimination within those groups of several individuals bearing distinct MLGs when using dinucleotide microsatellites. In the same way, the relationship between the number of tri- and heptanucleotide microsatellites and the apparent genetic diversity (Figure 2a) indicated that even using the full set underestimates the genetic diversity of P. oceanica populations. In contrast, we observed an asymptotic relationship between the number of dinucleotide markers used and the clonal diversity revealed by these for most populations of both P. oceanica and C. nodosa, which reached unity for the C. nodosa seedlings, as expected (Figure 2). This relationship indicates that it is possible to select one or several subsets of markers yielding accurate estimates of clonal diversity for these species. The optimal combination of markers, leading both to an asymptotic shape and to low Psex values (<.05), was found to be, for P. oceanica, a set of seven dinucleotides, and for C. nodosa, a set of six dinucleotides.
Finally, the frequency distribution of the number of different alleles between all MLG pairs showed unimodal distributions in all populations, with no apparent trend toward higher frequency or extra peak at very low values, as might be expected if somatic mutation was a common event (see the appendix). The seed sample of C. nodosa can be considered as a control distribution in which no somatic mutation should be expected. Slightly more low values can be observed in P. oceanica than in C. nodosa, which may be attributed to their distinct mating system, P. oceanica being monoecious and able to self-fertilize, whereas C. nodosa is dioecious.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Very different conclusions can be reached concerning the level of genetic polymorphism, either in terms of alleles or genotypic diversity, depending on the markers used (Figure 1 and Table 2), not only between allozymes (R = 0.14) and RAPD (an average of 0.07 in the first study and 0.49 in the second study), but dinucleotide (0.60) and tri- and heptanucleotide (0.38) microsatellites. One may be concerned by the influence of distinct sampling strategies on this result. However, the area sampled for allozymes studies was larger than for any other studies (Table 1), which then cannot explain the lowest level of genotypic diversity observed with those markers. More important, samples collected from eastern to western Mediterranean localities have common allozyme MLG profiles. As for studies using RAPD or microsatellites, the sampling scheme and average distance between shoots were similar, except in the study with dinucleotide microsatellites, in which the distance between shoots was less (Table 1), which would nevertheless tend to increase the chance to sample shoots from the same clones and would therefore not cause the higher genotypic diversities observed here for these markers. However, in the present study, a very different estimation of R could be derived from analysis of the same number of markers (five) on the same population samples with dinucleotide (0.52) and tri- and heptanucleotide (0.20) microsatellites (Figure 2a,b and Table 2).
Reports of limitations linked to microsatellite markers are more scarce than limitations linked to allozymes or RAPD (Allendorf and Seeb 2000; Beaumont and Nichols 1996; Parker et al. 1998). However, different levels of genetic variability depending on microsatellite motif have been reported in some eukaryote genomes, and the relative mutation rate of dinucleotides versus tri- and heptanucleotides is estimated to be between 1.5 and 2.1 (Anderson et al. 2000; Chakraborty et al. 1997). This is thought to be due to both the differential mutation rate during replication and to a higher rate of recombination and consequent mismatch repair (Chakraborty et al. 1997; Li et al. 2002). The average number of alleles per locus is a linear function of 4Neµ, where Ne is the effective population size and µ is the mutation rate (Kimura 1983). In our study, this number is 2.5 to 3 times higher for dinucleotides than for trinucleotides, instead of 1.5 to 2.1, suggesting a ratio of respective mutation rates (µdi/µtri) somewhat higher than estimated thus far, although this could be a consequence of variance due to the limited number of microsatellites used. This mutation rate should lead to careful screening for possible bias due to somatic mutations at dinucleotide loci. However, in the present study, the frequency distribution of the pairwise number of allele differences in all populations did not show evidence for a significant bias of genotypic diversity due to somatic mutations. Although slightly more low values can be observed in P. oceanica than in C. nodosa, this may be due to their distinct mating system, P. oceanica being monoecious and able to self-fertilize, whereas C. nodosa is dioecious. A higher frequency of related individuals may then be observed in P. oceanica meadows. Yet no secondary peak toward very low values was observed, but instead, an unimodal distribution shape appeared to be the rule.
The perils of drawing inferences on the population structure of clonal organisms using markers of insufficient resolution are evident when comparing the results obtained in P. oceanica with different microsatellites. In particular, the population sampled in Malta exhibited the lowest number of clones with tri- and heptanucleotides (R = 0.14), suggesting this meadow relies on clonal (versus sexual) reproduction (Table 2 and Figure 2a). However, the population in Malta clearly emerges as one of the most genetically diverse (R = 0.84) when examined with the more powerful dinucleotide microsatellites, suggesting high level of sexual reproduction in this particular meadow (Table 2 and Figure 2b). Hence the use of markers of limited power introduces both quantitative and qualitative errors in assessments of the genetic diversity of populations of clonal organisms, as not only was clonal diversity underestimated, but the relative ranking of clonal diversity among the populations examined was also in error.
The combined method reported here provides a convenient method for selecting the best combination of microsatellites to obtain accurate descriptions of the genetic diversity of populations of clonal organisms, provided sufficient highly polymorphic markers are available. The results presented confirm the expected asymptotic shape of the relationship between the number of microsatellites used and the genetic diversity they reveal (Figure 2b,c), and demonstrate that failure to observe such asymptotic patterns is indicative of insufficient power (Figure 2a). In addition, all the calculated probabilities for any pair of identical genotypes to be derived from two distinct events of sexual reproduction (Psex) were less than .05, further indicating that unambiguous estimates of clonal diversity of the meadows examined could be derived with the markers used. The usefulness of this combined approach is stressed by the fact that it would have warned of the likelihood of drawing erroneous inferences on the population structure of P. oceanica with the use of the tri- or heptanucleotide markers, where no genotypic diversity asymptotic value was reached and identity probabilities were not significant for all groups of MLG. The application of the method to C. nodosa seedlings (Figure 2c), for which the relationship between the number of microsatellite markers used and the estimated genetic diversity converged to the expected asymptotic value of one, further confirms that the approach provided here allows assessment of the accuracy of inferences on the genetic diversity of clonal organisms derived using different sets of markers.
Although genotyping as many distinct loci as possible will ensure the maximal genotype diversity of the samples analyzed, this practice is seldom realistic because of resource limitations, both time and money. Under these circumstances, the procedure can also been used in a pilot study to select the minimum combination of markers delivering accurate estimates of genetic diversity (i.e., asymptotic values and significant Psex values), thereby helping to optimize the cost-efficiency of research efforts in terms of genotyping and in terms of time and money. The most cost-effective combinations include seven and six markers for P. oceanica and C. nodosa, respectively.
In conclusion, the results presented here demonstrate the risks of delivering quantitatively and qualitatively erroneous inferences on the genetic diversity of populations of clonal organisms when the markers available have insufficient power. These results show that conclusions about low sexual reproduction in populations of clonal species derived with the use of markers showing low polymorphism (i.e., a small number of alleles, or not evenly distributed) need to be reassessed using markers capable of revealing the distinct genotypes of the population. The approach provided here, applicable to any clonal organism, allows the combined assessment of the asymptotic trend of the markers and of the significance of the associated likelihood probability of identity in order to ascertain the detection of all distinct genotypes sampled, and thus to provide accurate estimates of population genetic diversity, while estimating the most cost-effective combination of markers to achieve this goal.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frequency distribution of the pairwise number of allele differences between MLGs in each of eight P. oceanica samples and in two C. nodosa samples. The x-axis represent the number of allele differences and the y-axis is the frequency distribution for each x rank.


| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This research was funded by projects M&Ms (EVK3-CT-2000-00044) and LIFE-Posidonia (2000/NAT/E/7303) of the European Union. The European Science Foundation (ESF) and Fundacao para a Ciencia ea Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal funded a postdoctoral (to S.A.-H.) and a doctoral (to F.A.) fellowship. We thank E. Díaz-Almela, R. Santiago-Doménech, and E. Álvarez-Perez for help with sample collection, and G. Pearson and three anonymous referees for useful comments on a preliminary version of this manuscript.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Corresponding Editor: James Hamrick
Received February 16, 2004
Accepted December 15, 2004
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-
Alberte RS, Suba GK, Procaccini G, Zimmerman RC, and Fain SR, 1994. Assessment of genetic diversity of seagrass populations using DNA-fingerprintingimplications for population stability and management. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10491053.
Alberto F, Correia L, Arnaud-Haond S, Billot C, Duarte CM, and Serrão E, 2003a. New microsatellites markers for the endemic Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mol Ecol Notes 3:253255.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Alberto F, Correia L, Billot C, Duarte CM, and Serrao E, 2003b. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. Mol Ecol Notes 3:397399.[CrossRef]
Allendorf FW and Seeb LW, 2000. Concordance of genetic divergence among sockeye salmon populations at allozyme, nuclear DNA, and mitochondrial DNA markers. Evolution 54:640651.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Anderson TJC, Su XZ, Roddam A, and Day KP, 2000. Complex mutations in a high proportion of microsatellite loci from the protozoan parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Ecol 9:15991608.[CrossRef][Medline]
Avise JC, 1989. A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends Ecol Evol 4:279281.
Avise JC, 1994. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution New York: Chapman & Hall.
Barrett SCH, Eckert CG, and Husband BC, 1993. Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant-populations. Aquat Bot 44:105145.[CrossRef]
Beaumont AR and Pether SMJ, 1996. Allozyme variation and gene flow between cockle Cerastoderma edule populations in southern United Kingdom. Fish Res 28:263275.[CrossRef]
Beaumont MA and Nichols RA, 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:16191626.
Capiomont A, Sandmeier M, Caye G, and Meinesz A, 1996. Enzyme polymorphism in Posidonia oceanica, a seagrass endemic to the Mediterranean. Aquat Bot 54:265277.[CrossRef]
Chakraborty R, Kimmel M, Stivers DN, Davison LJ, and Deka R, 1997. Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10411046.
Charlesworth B, 1998. Measure of divergence between populations and the effects of forces that reduce variability. Mol Biol Evol 15:538543.[Abstract]
Dorken ME and Eckert CG, 2001. Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). J Ecol 89:339350.[CrossRef]
Doyle JJ and Doyle JL, 1988. Natural interspecific hybridization in eastern North American Claytonia. Am J Bot 75:12381246.[CrossRef]
Hagen MJ and Hamrick JL, 1996. Population level processes in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv trifolii: the role of founder effects. Mol Ecol 5:707714.[CrossRef]
Hamrick JL and Godt MJW, 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species In: Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources (Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, and Weir BS, eds). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Jover MA, del Castillo-Agudo L, Garcia-Carrascosa M, and Segura J, 2003. Random amplified polymorphic DNA assessment of diversity in western Mediterranean populations of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Am J Bot 90:364369.
Kimura M, 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laushman RH, 1993. Population-genetics of hydrophilous angiosperms. Aquat Bot 44:147158.[CrossRef]
Lemaire C, Allegrucci G, Naciri M, Bahri-Sfar L, Kara H, and Bonhomme F, 2000. Do discrepancies between microsatellites and allozyme variation reveal differential selection between sea and lagoon in the sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)?. Mol Ecol 9:457468.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, and Nevo E, 2002. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol 11:24532465.[CrossRef][Medline]
Parker PG, Sow AA, Schug MD, Booton GC, and Fuerst PA, 1998. What molecules can tell us about populations: choosing and using a molecular marker. Ecology 79:361382.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Parks JC and Werth CR, 1993. A study of spatial features of clones in a population of bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae). Am J Bot 80:537544.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pogson GH, Mesa KA, and Boutilier RG, 1995. Genetic population and gene flow in the Atlantic cod Gadhus morhua: a comparison of allozyme and nuclear RFLP loci. Genetics 139:375385.[Abstract]
Procaccini G, Alberte RS, and Mazzella L, 1996. Genetic structure of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in the western Mediterranean: ecological implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:153160.
Procaccini G and Mazzella L, 1996. Genetic variability and reproduction in two Mediterranean seagrasses In: Seagrass Biology: Proceedings of an International Workshop, Rottnest Island, Western Australia, January 2529, 1996. Nedlands, Western Australia: University of Western Australia; 8592.
Procaccini G, Orsini L, Ruggiero MV, and Scardi M, 2001. Spatial patterns of genetic diversity in Posidonia oceanica, an endemic Mediterranean seagrass. Mol Ecol 10:14131421.[CrossRef][Medline]
Procaccini G and Waycott M, 1998. Microsatellite loci identified in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. J Hered 89:562568.
Reusch TBH, 2001. New markersold questions: population genetics of seagrasses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 211:261274.
Reusch TBH, Stam WT, and Olsen JL, 2000. A microsatellite-based estimation of clonal diversity and population subdivision in Zostera marina, a marine flowering plant. Mol Ecol 9:127140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stenberg P, Lundmark M, and Saura A, 2003. MLGsim: a program for detecting clones using a simulation approach. Mol Ecol Notes 3:329331.[CrossRef]
Sunnucks P, 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:199203.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tibayrenc M, Kjellberg F, and Ayala F, 1990. A clonal theory of parasitic protozoa: the population structures of Entamoeba, Giardia, Leishmania, Naegleria, Plasmodium, Trichomonas, and Trypanosoma and their Medical and Taxonomical Consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:24142418.
Waycott M, 1995. Assessment of genetic variation and clonality in the seagrass Posidonia australis using RAPD and allozyme analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116:289295.
Waycott M, Walker DI, and James SH, 1996. Genetic uniformity in Amphibolis antarctica, a dioecious seagrass. Heredity 76:578585.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. F. Rozenfeld, S. Arnaud-Haond, E. Hernandez-Garcia, V. M. Eguiluz, E. A. Serrao, and C. M. Duarte Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system PNAS, December 2, 2008; 105(48): 18824 - 18829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F Rozenfeld, S. Arnaud-Haond, E. Hernandez-Garcia, V. M Eguiluz, M. A Matias, E. Serrao, and C. M Duarte Spectrum of genetic diversity and networks of clonal organisms J R Soc Interface, December 22, 2007; 4(17): 1093 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. LHUILLIER, J.-F. BUTAUD, and J.-M. BOUVET Extensive Clonality and Strong Differentiation in the Insular Pacific Tree Santalum insulare: Implications for its Conservation Ann. Bot., November 1, 2006; 98(5): 1061 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




of n loci (n = 1,...,l; l = number of loci available), giving the average clonal diversity R (±SE) for each n. Clonal diversity estimated by R = G 1/N 1, where G is the number of genotypes and N is the sample size.

