Skip Navigation


Journal of Heredity Advance Access originally published online on July 12, 2006
Journal of Heredity 2006 97(5):525-530; doi:10.1093/jhered/esl012
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/525    most recent
esl012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2006. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Brief Communications

Mitochondrial DNA and Microsatellite DNA Variation in Domestic Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) and Relationships with Wild Caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti, Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus, and Rangifer tarandus caribou)

Matthew A. Cronin, Michael D. MacNeil, and John C. Patton

From the School of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 533 E. Fireweed Ave., Palmer, AK 99645 (Cronin); the Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 243 Fort Keogh Road, Miles City, MT 59301 (MacNeil); and the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Patton)

Address correspondence to M. A. Cronin at the address above, or e-mail: ffmac1{at}uaf.edu.

Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in Alaska are semidomestic livestock descended from 1280 animals introduced from Siberia, Russia, approximately 100 years ago. Genetic variation at 18 microsatellite DNA loci and the cytochrome b gene of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was quantified in reindeer from Alaska, Siberia (Russia), and Scandinavia and compared with wild North American caribou. Mean sequence divergence among 15 mtDNA haplotypes in reindeer was 0.007 substitutions per nucleotide site, and reindeer mtDNA is polyphyletic with caribou mtDNA. Microsatellite allele and mtDNA haplotype frequencies are similar between Alaskan and Russian reindeer and differentiated between these and Scandinavian reindeer. The frequencies of microsatellite alleles and mtDNA haplotypes are different in reindeer and wild caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti, Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus, and Rangifer tarandus caribou). Alaskan reindeer have maintained a genetic variation comparable to that in Russia and differentiated from that of wild caribou, >100 years after their introduction to Alaska.


Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in Alaska occur in semidomestic herds descended from animals introduced from Siberia, Russia, between 1892 and 1902. After the introduction of 1280 animals, Alaskan reindeer herds increased to 5148 in 1902, 259 000 in 1922, and 600 000 in the 1930s (Stern and others 1980). The reindeer herds then decreased due to reduced management, predation, and emigration to wild caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) herds to approximately 25 000 in 1950–1977 and 20 000 at present. Preliminary analyses showed limited genetic differentiation among the Alaskan and Siberian reindeer herds (Cronin, Patton, and others 2003).

Reindeer in Alaska have interbred with wild caribou on open ranges (Bailey and Hendee 1926; Rausch 1951; Stern and others 1980) and in captivity (Klein 1980). However, domestic reindeer and wild caribou in Alaska have different allele frequencies for serum transferrin (Røed and Whitten 1986), mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), kappa casein, major histocompatibility complex genes (Cronin and others 1995), and microsatellite loci (Cronin, Patton, and others 2003), suggesting little genetic introgression in either direction. This is probably because of low fitness of hybrid animals in the wild and relatively little crossbreeding in captivity. Caribou are generally larger, have longer legs, are more wary and difficult to handle, may breed 2–4 weeks earlier, are more migratory, and may have different frequencies of antlered females than reindeer (Klein 1980; Reimers 1993; Cronin, Haskell, and Ballard 2003).

Alaskan reindeer provide interesting insights of genetic variation and differentiation at 2 levels: among introduced herds (i.e., Alaska) and herds from the geographic region of origin (i.e., Siberia, Russia) and between domestic (i.e., reindeer) and wild (i.e., caribou) relatives of the same species. In this paper we quantified the genetic variation of reindeer from Alaska, Siberia (Russia), and Scandinavia and compared it with that in wild caribou. We expanded previous analyses of 7 microsatellite loci (Cronin, Patton, and others 2003) to include additional reindeer herds, microsatellite loci, and sequences of the mtDNA cytochrome b gene. The mtDNA is maternally inherited, and microsatellites are biparentally inherited and provide different insights into genetic variation and differentiation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Tissue and blood samples were collected from 13 reindeer herds from 3 regions: Alaska, Russia, and Scandinavia (Figure 1, Table A1). The Alaskan herds derived from reindeer that were transplanted from Siberia, Russia, to the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Reindeer from the Russian herds were from the Magadan district in Siberia. It is not known if these are descendents of the source stock of the Alaskan transplants, but they are from the same general part of Siberia. The Scandinavian reindeer are from Norway and Sweden (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) and Svalbard Island (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchos) that have been previously analyzed for genetic variation (Olsaker and Røed 1990; Røed and Midthjell 1998; Flagstad and Røed 2003). The Svalbard Island reindeer have different morphology and patterns of genetic variation than the reindeer from Norway and Sweden (Storset and others 1978; Røed and Whitten 1986; Gravlund and others 1998; Côté and others 2002).


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of reindeer herds in Alaska sampled for genetic analysis.

 
Genomic DNA was extracted, and the mtDNA cytochrome b gene was amplified and sequenced for 76 reindeer representing the 13 reindeer herds (Table A1) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described by Cronin and others (1999). Sequences were aligned with the program SEQUENCHER (Gene Codes Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). Nucleotide sequence divergences were calculated for all nucleotide sites and for synonymous (ds) and nonsynonymous (dn) substitutions (Jukes and Cantor 1969) with the MEGA computer program (Kumar and others 1993). We used a Z-test to test the hypothesis that substitutions reflect purifying selection (i.e., ds > dn). Phylogenetic relationships of the mtDNA sequences were assessed with maximum parsimony with the PAUP program (Swofford 2002). We included the cytochrome b sequence of representative haplotypes from 3 subspecies of wild caribou (Alaskan barren-ground caribou R. t. granti, Canadian barren-ground caribou Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus, and woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou, Cronin and others 2005) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) as an out-group.

Genotypes at 18 microsatellite loci were determined for 145 reindeer with PCR primers developed in cattle and methods applied to caribou (Cronin and others 2005). The loci include 7 (IGF1, CRH, RBP3, BM848, BM6438, BMC1009, and CSN10) that were used previously on reindeer (Cronin, Patton, and others 2003) and 11 others (BMS574, TGLA44, BMS1788, BMS1315, BMS1247, ILSTS028, ILSTS023, BMS745, BMS468, BMS2270, and CSSM036) (Fries and others 1993; Bishop and others 1994). Some microsatellite loci are conserved between bovids and cervids (Engel and others 1996; Kuhn and others 1996; Talbot and others 1996; Wilson and others 1997; Slate and others 1998), but it is not known if these loci occur on homologous chromosomes in both families. Also, some of these loci are linked to functional genes in the cattle genome (retinol-binding protein 3 interstitial [RBP3], corticotropin-releasing hormone [CRH], kappa casein [CSN10], insulin-like growth factor IGF1) and may also be linked in the Rangifer genome.

The herds were pooled into Alaskan, Russian, and Scandinavian regions for data analysis. Microsatellite DNA variation was quantified including the average number of alleles per locus (A) and observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) with the MICROSATELLITE TOOLKIT computer program (Park 2001), and allelic richness (El Mousadik and Petit 1996) with the F-STAT program (Goudet 1995). Allelic richness was compared between each pair of regions with a t-test of the mean values for the 18 loci. The F-STAT program was used to test among loci for linkage disequilibrium and differentiation of allele frequencies among regions with Fst (Weir and Cockerham 1984). The GENEPOP program (Raymond and Rousset 1995) was used to test among genotypes at each locus for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

We also compared levels of variation and allele frequencies at the 18 microsatellite loci and mtDNA between the reindeer and the wild caribou analyzed by Cronin and others (2005). We calculated genetic distances (chord distance; Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards 1967) for the microsatellite loci between each group and constructed a dendrogram using the unweighted pair group method based on arithmetic averages (UPGMA; Sneath and Sokal 1973) with the BIOSYS program (Swofford and Selander 1981).


    Results
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Mitochondrial DNA
We obtained 1194 nucleotides of mtDNA cytochrome b sequence for 76 reindeer (GenBank accession numbers AY726730 and DQ673122DQ673135) that comprised 15 mtDNA haplotypes (designated R1–R15) differing by greater double equals1 nucleotide substitutions. There were substitutions at 36 different nucleotide positions including 31 transitions and 5 transversions, and 7 of these substitutions resulted in amino acid substitutions (i.e., nonsynonymous substitutions). The mean nucleotide sequence divergence distances (Jukes and Cantor 1969) between the 15 reindeer haplotypes was 0.0069 (standard error [SE] = 0.0012) substitutions per nucleotide site. The rate of synonymous substitutions between haplotypes (ds = 0.0223) was significantly greater than the rate of nonsynonymous substitutions (dn = 0.0013) between haplotypes (Z = 4.487, P < 0.00001), suggesting that purifying selection occurs at this mtDNA locus. The average sequence divergence between the 15 reindeer haplotypes and the white-tailed deer haplotype was 0.1267 (SE = 0.0005).

A strict consensus tree of the mtDNA cytochrome b sequences (Figure 2A) of 6 equally parsimonious trees was generated (28 parsimonious informative sites, 192 steps; consistency index = 0.889, retention index = 0.924). Bootstrap values higher than 0.5 are shown above the nodes of the tree, and Bremer indices are shown below the nodes. The consensus tree includes a large clade containing all 15 of the reindeer haplotypes along with the wild barren-ground caribou haplotypes (C8, C12). The woodland caribou haplotype (C6) occurs in a separate clade. There is no geographic or subspecific structure apparent in the large clade, and the mtDNA phylogeny of reindeer and barren-ground caribou appears polyphyletic. Phylogenetic trees with similar topologies were obtained with UPGMA and Neighbor-Joining (Saitou and Nei 1987) analyses of Jukes and Cantor (1969) nucleotide sequence distances (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. (A) Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree of mtDNA cytochrome b haplotypes in reindeer. Three haplotypes for caribou and one haplotype for white-tailed deer are included. The numbers preceded by an "R" (reindeer) or a "C" (caribou) represent mtDNA haplotypes, and locations in which haplotypes occurred are indicated. Bootstrap values >0.5 are shown above nodes, and Bremer values are shown below nodes. (B) UPGMA dendrogram of reindeer and caribou, constructed with genetic distances (Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards 1967) for 18 microsatellite DNA loci.

 
The mtDNA haplotype distributions (without regard to phylogeny) indicate considerable variation among the 3 regions (Fst = 0.191, Table 1). There are 8 haplotypes in the Alaskan reindeer and 8 haplotypes in the Russian reindeer. Four of these are shared by Alaskan and Russian reindeer, with 2 predominating in both regions (R1 and R2). The mtDNA haplotype frequencies are not different in reindeer from Alaska and Russia (Fst = –0.004). Three haplotypes occur only in Scandinavian reindeer, resulting in significant differentiation between Scandinavia and Alaska (Fst = 0.332) and Russia (Fst = 0.249).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Measures of microsatellite variation and numbers of mtDNA haplotypes in reindeer and caribou

 
Microsatellites
We determined genotypes and allele frequencies for 145 reindeer at 18 microsatellite loci. Most loci are highly polymorphic, although 2 were monomorphic (ILSTS023 and CSN10) and 2 (BMC1009 and BMS1315) had only 2 alleles. Allelic richness varied from 3.66 to 3.82 and was not significantly different among the regions (Table 1). The average observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.34 to 0.39, and average expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.42 to 0.45 among the reindeer in the 3 regions. Tests among the 16 polymorphic loci showed that some loci deviated (P < 0.05) from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, including the CRH, BM848, TGLA44, and BM1788 loci in Alaska, the BM6438, BM848, CSSM036, and TGLA44 loci in Russia, and the CRH, BM848, CSSM036, and BMS468 loci in Scandinavia. In all these cases there were fewer heterozygotes than expected, which may reflect that our samples came from several herds in each region (i.e., a Wahlund effect). No pairs of loci had significant (P > 0.0003) nonrandom associations of genotypes, indicating the loci are not linked. The distribution of microsatellite alleles shows there is significant differentiation among the 3 regions indicated by an Fst higher than zero (Fst = 0.073, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.052–0.095). Pairwise Fst values indicate relatively low level of differentiation between Alaska and Russia (Fst = 0.053, 95% CI 0.025–0.084) and more differentiation between Alaska and Scandinavia (Fst = 0.100, 95% CI 0.059–0.144) and Russia and Scandinavia (Fst = 0.121, 95% CI 0.084–0.158).

Comparison of Reindeer and Wild Caribou
Different mtDNA haplotypes occur in reindeer and caribou with one exception: 2 caribou in Alaska had haplotype R1, probably because of introgressive hybridization from reindeer to wild caribou. This is 2.6% of the 78 Alaskan caribou for which mtDNA haplotypes were determined. Forty-five mtDNA haplotypes observed in Alaskan barren-ground caribou, 10 haplotypes in Canadian barren-ground caribou, and 8 haplotypes in woodland caribou (Cronin and others 2005) were not observed in any of the reindeer herds.

There are more microsatellite alleles and higher allelic richness in barren-ground caribou than reindeer (Table 1). Allelic richness was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the Alaskan and Canadian barren-ground caribou than in the Alaskan reindeer, Russian reindeer, Scandinavian reindeer, and woodland caribou. Genetic distances (Table 2) of microsatellite allele frequencies indicate similarity of Alaskan and Russian reindeer, and of Alaskan and Canadian barren-ground caribou, and differentiation of these groups and woodland caribou and Scandinavian reindeer. These relationships are shown in the dendrogram (Figure 2B) in which the Alaskan and Russian reindeer occur in a cluster, the Alaskan and Canadian barren-ground caribou occur in a cluster, and the woodland caribou and Scandinavian reindeer cluster outside these groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Genetic distances (Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards 1967) between reindeer and caribou

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Reindeer in Alaska have levels of genetic variation and mtDNA haplotype and microsatellite allele frequencies comparable to herds in the geographic region of origin, Siberia, Russia, more than 100 years after their introduction. This is despite repeated founder events as animals were introduced from Siberia to the Seward Peninsula and then dispersed to establish other herds. We do not know the relationship of our Russian samples and the source herds of the Alaskan samples, but our results suggest they share recent common ancestry. The large number of founders (1280 animals) and rapid herd growth following introduction may have maintained genetic variation in Alaskan reindeer. In contrast, the Svalbard Island reindeer have low genetic variation (Table A1, Røed and Whitten 1986; Gravlund and others 1998; Côté and others 2002).

Microsatellite allele and mtDNA haplotype frequencies are differentiated between the Alaskan/Russian reindeer and wild caribou in Alaska (Table 2, Figure 2B). Our results and those of others (Røed and Whitten 1986; Cronin and others 1995) suggest that introgressive hybridization between reindeer and wild caribou has been limited despite extensive mixing of reindeer and caribou herds in western Alaska (Bailey and Hendee 1926; Rausch 1951; Klein 1980; Stern and others 1980). A low frequency of reindeer mtDNA haplotypes in caribou (2.6%) indicates some female-mediated gene flow. The similarity of the Alaskan and Canadian barren-ground caribou (Figure 2B) also suggests that the Alaskan caribou have maintained native genetic structure with limited reindeer influence.

Our results show patterns of differentiation that reflect population histories. The polyphyletic mtDNA relationships of the Alaskan/Russian reindeer and barren-ground caribou suggest recent common ancestry during the last (Wisconsin) glaciation when the Bering land bridge connected Siberia and Alaska. However, postglacial restriction of gene flow is indicated by different mtDNA haplotypes and microsatellite allele frequencies in reindeer and caribou. The Russian reindeer (and Alaskan transplants) may represent populations isolated postglacially on the Asian side of the Bering Strait (with subsequent domestication), while the Alaskan and Canadian caribou represent populations on the North American side. The unique mtDNA haplotypes and differentiated microsatellite allele frequencies of woodland caribou and Scandinavian reindeer probably resulted from isolation south of the North American continental glaciers and in a northern European glacial refugium, respectively (Røed and Whitten 1986; Røed and others 1991; Cronin 1992; Gravlund and others 1998; Courtois and others 2003; Flagstad and Røed 2003).

The domestication of reindeer in Eurasia may have been accompanied by founder effects, genetic drift, and selection that may have resulted in lower levels of genetic variation in reindeer than large, wild caribou populations with high levels of gene flow. However, the reindeer herds in Alaska and Siberia appear to have considerable levels of genetic variation, probably maintained with adequate numbers of animals in herd introductions and management.


    Appendix
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table A1. Measures of genetic variation for 18 microsatellite loci and mtDNA in reindeer herds

 

    Acknowledgments
 
Funding for this paper was provided by BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., the US Department of Agriculture, and the State of Alaska. Samples were obtained from G. Finstad, L. Renecker, K. Røed, N. Balmysheva, A. Lima de Faria, C. Perham, M. Williams, T. Gray, and L. Davis. L. French conducted many of the microsatellite laboratory analyses. R. DeSalle and 2 anonymous reviewers provided useful comments.


    Footnotes
 
Corresponding Editor: Rob DeSalle

Received September 5, 2005
Accepted June 6, 2006


    References
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 

    Bailey AM and Hendee RW. (1926) Notes on the mammals of northwestern Alaska. J Mammal 7:9–28.[CrossRef]

    Bishop MD, Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, Sunden SLF, Hawkins GA, Toldo SS, Fries R, Grosz MD, Yoo J, Beattie CW. (1994) A genetic linkage map for cattle. Genetics 136:61939.

    Cavalli-Sforza LL and Edwards AWF. (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–57.

    Côté SD, Dallas JF, Marshall F, Irvine RJ, Langvatn R, Albon SD. (2002) Microsatellite DNA evidence for genetic drift and philopatry in Svalbard reindeer. Mol Ecol 11:1923–30.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Courtois RL, Bernatchez L, Ouellet JP, Breton L. (2003) Significance of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) ecotypes from a molecular genetics viewpoint. Conserv Genet 4:393–404.[CrossRef]

    Cronin MA. (1992) Intraspecific variation in mitochondrial DNA of North American cervids. J Mammal 73:70–82.[CrossRef]

    Cronin MA, Haskell SP, Ballard WB. (2003) The frequency of antlerless female caribou and reindeer in Alaska. Rangifer 23:6770.

    Cronin MA, MacNeil MD, Patton JC. (2005) Variation in mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite DNA in caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in North America. J Mammal 86:495–505.[CrossRef]

    Cronin MA, Patton JC, Balmysheva N, MacNeil MD. (2003) Genetic variation in caribou and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Anim Genet 34:33–41.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Cronin MA, Renecker L, Pierson BJ, Patton JC. (1995) Genetic variation in domestic reindeer and wild caribou in Alaska. Anim Genet 26:427–34.[ISI][Medline]

    Cronin MA, Shideler R, Hechtel J, Strobeck C, Paetkau D. (1999) Genetic relationships of grizzly bears in the Prudhoe Bay region of Alaska: inference from microsatellite DNA, mitochondrial DNA, and field observations. J Hered 90:622–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    El Mousadik A and Petit RJ. (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic of Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–9.[CrossRef][ISI]

    Engel SR, Linn RA, Taylor JF, Davis SK. (1996) Conservation of microsatellite loci across species of rtiodactyls: implications for population studies. J Mammal 77:504–18.[CrossRef]

    Flagstad O and Røed KH. (2003) Refugial origins of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 57:658–70.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Fries R, Eggen A, Womack JE. (1993) The bovine genome map. Mamm Genome 4:405–28.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Goudet J. (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–6.[Free Full Text]

    Gravlund P, Meldgaard M, Pääbo S, Arctander P. (1998) Polyphyletic origin of the small-bodied, high-arctic subspecies of tundra reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Mol Phylogenet Evol 10:151–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Jukes TH and Cantor CR. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN (Ed.). Mammalian protein metabolism(Academic Press, New York) pp. 21–132.

    Klein DR. (1980) Conflicts between domestic reindeer and their wild counterparts. Arctic 33:731–56.

    Kuhn R, Anastassiadis C, Pirchner F. (1996) Transfer of bovine microsatellites to the cervine (Cervus elaphus). Anim Genet 27:199–201.[ISI][Medline]

    Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. (1993) MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis(Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA).

    Lay JS. (1994) Researchers probe Hagemeister Island reindeer die-off of 1992. Agroborealis 26:17–9.

    Olsaker I and Røed KH. (1990) The major histocompatibility complex of reindeer. Rangifer 3:369–72.

    Park SDE. (2001) Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection [PhD dissertation](University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland).

    Rausch R. (1951) Notes on the Nunamiut Eskimo and mammals of the Anaktuvuk Pass Region, Brooks Range, Alaska. Arctic 4:147–95.

    Raymond M and Rousset F. (1995) GENEPOP: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–9.[Free Full Text]

    Reimers E. (1993) Antlerless females among reindeer and caribou. Can J Zool 71:1319–25.

    Røed KH, Ferguson MAD, Crête M, Bergerud TA. (1991) Genetic variation in transferrin as a predictor for differentiation and evolution of caribou from eastern Canada. Rangifer 11:65–74.

    Røed KH and Midthjell L. (1998) Microsatellites in reindeer, Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other cervids. Mol Ecol 7:1771–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Røed KH and Whitten KR. (1986) Transferrin variation and evolution of Alaskan reindeer and caribou, Rangifer tarandus L. Rangifer 1:247–51.

    Saitou N and Nei M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–25.[Abstract]

    Slate J, Coltman DW, Goodman SJ, MacLean I, Pemberton JL, Williams JL. (1998) Bovine microsatellite loci are highly conserved in red deer (Cervus elaphus), sika deer (Cervus nippon) and Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Anim Genet 29:307–15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Sneath PH and Sokal RR. (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA).

    Stern RO, Arobio EL, Naylor LL, Thomas WC. (1980) Eskimos, Reindeer, and Land(AES, School of Agriculture and Land Resources Management, University of Alaska. Bulletin 59, Fairbanks, AK).

    Storset A, Osaisen B, Wika M, Bjarghov R. (1978) Genetic markers in the Spitsbergen reindeer. Hereditas 88:113–5.[ISI][Medline]

    Swofford DL. (2002) PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 4.0(Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA).

    Swofford DL and Selander RB. (1981) BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72:281–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Talbot J, Haigh J, Plante Y. (1996) A parentage evaluation test in North American elk (Wapiti) using microsatellites of ovine and bovine origin. Anim Genet 27:117–9.[ISI][Medline]

    Weir BS and Cockerham CC. (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–70.[CrossRef][ISI]

    Wilson GA, Strobeck C, Wu L, Coffin JW. (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other artiodactyls. Mol Ecol 6:697–9.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/525    most recent
esl012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?