Skip Navigation



Journal of Heredity Advance Access published online on February 2, 2008

Journal of Heredity, doi:10.1093/jhered/esm119
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/137    most recent
esm119v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Halanych, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Halanych, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2008. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Evaluating Connectivity in the Brooding Brittle Star Astrotoma agassizii across the Drake Passage in the Southern Ocean

Rebecca L. Hunter, and Kenneth M. Halanych

From the Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 101 Rouse Life Sciences Building, Auburn, AL 36849

Address correspondence to Rebecca L. Hunter at the address above, or e-mail: belchrl{at}auburn.edu.

Studies examining population structure and genetic diversity of benthic marine invertebrates in the Southern Ocean have emerged in recent years. However, many taxonomic groups remain largely unstudied, echinoderms being one conspicuous example. The brittle star Astrotoma agassizii is distributed widely throughout Antarctica and southern South America. This species is a brooding echinoderm and therefore may have limited dispersal capacity. In order to determine the effect of hypothesized isolating barriers in the Southern Ocean, such as depth, geographic distance, and the polar front, 2 mitochondrial DNA markers were used to compare populations from the South American and Antarctic continental shelves. Astrotoma agassizii was shown to be genetically discontinuous across the polar front. In fact, populations previously assumed to be panmictic instead represent 3 separate lineages that lack morphological distinction. However, within lineages, genetic continuity was displayed across a large geographic range (>500 km). Therefore, despite lacking a pelagic larval stage, A. agassizii can disperse across substantial geographic distance within continental shelf regions. These results indicate that geographic distance alone may not be a barrier to dispersal, but rather the combined effects of distance, depth, and the polar front act to prevent gene flow between A. agassizii populations in the Southern Ocean.


Oceanographic current patterns and life-history traits, such as reproductive strategy, have been shown to directly affect dispersal of organisms in the marine environment (reviewed in Palumbi 1994), thereby profoundly influencing distributional patterns in the world's oceans. These factors and their influence on population structure of marine organisms have been studied across a wide range of taxa, allowing generalizations to be established on which hypotheses can be based. For example, studies have shown that marine invertebrate species with longer pelagic larval duration often show less population differentiation than those with abbreviated larval development (Berger 1973; Crisp 1978; Janson 1987; McMillan et al. 1992; Duffy 1993; Hunt 1993; Hellberg 1996; Hoskin 1997; Arndt and Smith 1998). However, this relationship can vary greatly, with some species showing high levels of differentiation despite long-lived pelagic larvae (e.g., Tracey et al. 1975; Burton 1986; Hare and Avise 1996). Effects of oceanographic barriers and life-history constraints have been evaluated across many geographic regions; however, one particularly distinctive biogeographic region, the Southern Ocean, is not well understood in this context. The roles of the polar front, small-scale gyres, and life-history traits that affect dispersal of marine organisms in the Southern Ocean are only beginning to be understood.

Isolation of the Antarctic continent is hypothesized to have been a driving evolutionary force for Antarctic fauna. Separation of Antarctica from South America and the ensuing onset of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), dated to between 24 and 41 mya (Lawver and Gahagan 2003; Pfuhl and McCave 2005; Scher and Martin 2006), are presumed to have been primary forces promoting speciation in Southern Ocean taxa (Patarnello et al. 1996; Page and Linse 2002; Clarke et al. 2005). The polar front, the region of the ACC marked by a 3–4 °C temperature change and high-flow velocity (Eastman 1993), is a particularly strong physical barrier (Clarke et al. 2005). ACC formation, coupled with decreasing atmospheric CO2 concentration (DeConto and Pollard 2003), is thought to have driven the gradual cooling and glaciation that began approximately 34 mya in the Antarctic (Zachos et al. 2001). This cooling and long period of isolation have led to a diverse and abundant benthic fauna that is typically stenothermal, eurybathic, and endemic to Antarctica (Ekman 1953; Hempel 1985). Endemism is particularly high in certain groups including fish (95%), amphipods (95%), pycnogonids (90%), isopods (87%), and certain echinoderm classes (73%) (Knox and Lowry 1977; Brandt 1991; Jazdzewski et al. 1991).

Whereas many Antarctic benthic organisms exhibit high levels of endemism, others show much lower levels despite apparent geographic and thermal isolation. For example, polychaete, echinoderm, and mollusk conspecifics have been reported on both Antarctic and South American continental shelves, and a well-recognized faunal affinity exists between these 2 geographic regions (Dell 1972; Arntz et al. 1994; Dayton et al. 1994). Lack of endemism in these species suggests some level of recent or ongoing gene flow between populations separated by the ACC. Several gene flow mechanisms have been proposed, including migration of benthic adults, larval dispersal, and rafting. Migration of adults is thought to occur along the Scotia Arc, a submerged ridge with a series of emergent islands that form a "stepping-stone" connection between the Antarctic Peninsula and South America (Fell et al. 1969). Dispersal of larvae or rafting adults/juveniles would most likely occur across the Drake Passage, the portion of the ACC separating Antarctica and South America representing the shortest distance between Antarctica and any other continent. Mechanistically, dispersal could occur across the ACC via warm- and cold-core rings (Clarke et al. 2005), mesoscale eddies known to transport larvae and rafting organisms (Robinson 1983; Scheltema 1986).

Studies investigating the evolutionary history of Antarctic fauna using molecular tools have emerged in recent years. These studies have focused primarily on groups such as notothenioid fish (Bargelloni, Marcato et al. 2000; Bargelloni, Zane et al. 2000; Stankovic et al. 2002), krill (Patarnello et al. 1996; Bargelloni, Zane et al. 2000), and mollusks (Brierley et al. 1993; Allcock et al. 1997; Page and Linse 2002) and concentrate on the ACC's role in promoting speciation and divergence in the Southern Ocean. Many Antarctic benthic organisms remain unstudied in terms of their evolutionary history, population connectivity, and biogeography, and only a few studies exist evaluating population connectivity of Southern Ocean species within South America (e.g., Brierley et al. 1993; Shaw et al. 2004). A conspicuous example of an unstudied taxon is the Ophiuroidea, abundant and ecologically important components of the Antarctic benthic community.

Astrotoma agassizii is one of 13 ophiuroid species shared between Antarctica and South America (Fell et al. 1969). This species has a circumpolar Antarctic/subantarctic distribution and occurs throughout the southern part of South America, in depths of 80–1200 m (Bartsch 1982). Astrotoma agassizii broods its embryos (Bernasconi 1965; De La Serna De Estaban 1966; Bartsch 1982; Smirnov IS, personal communication) and therefore lacks a dispersive larval stage. Astrotoma agassizii is recognized as a morphologically uniform species throughout Antarctica and South America. However, given potential for significant population structure owing to presumed limited dispersal capacity, we wanted to determine whether morphological uniformity corresponds also with genetic uniformity in this geographically and bathymetrically widespread species. Two mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) gene fragments were employed to evaluate the effects of geographic distance, depth, and the polar front on population structure and connectivity in this conspicuous Southern Ocean species.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 
Data Collection
Astrotoma agassizii samples were collected during 2 cruises to the southern tip of South America and Antarctic Peninsula aboard the R/V Laurence M. Gould. The first cruise took place from 23 November to 22 December 2004 and the second from 12 May to 13 June 2006. In total, 207 individuals were collected from 11 stations in South American waters and 30 individuals were collected from 6 Antarctic stations (Figure 1 and Table 1). Benthic samples were collected with an epibenthic sled, Blake trawl, or rock dredge. Samples intended for DNA analysis were either frozen upon collection at –80 °C or preserved in approximately 85% ethanol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Collection information for Astrotoma agassizii in South America and Antarctica

 


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Map showing collection localities for Astrotoma agassizii from South America and Antarctica.

 
DNA was extracted using the DNeasy® Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following manufacturer's protocol. Two mitochondrial gene fragments, 16S rDNA (16S) and cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII), were amplified using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols. 16SarL (5'-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3') and 16SbrH (5'-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3') (Palumbi et al. 1991) amplify an approximately 500-bp fragment from the middle of 16S. For COII, primers were designed based on a COII alignment spanning the diversity of extant echinoderms. The novel primers CO2_23AF (5'-MCARCTWGGWTTWCAAGA-3') and CO2_577R (5'-TCSGARCATTGSCCATARAA-3') amplify an approximately 550-bp fragment from the 5' end of the gene. Double-stranded PCR products were purified using either a gel-freeze method or MontageTM PCR Filter Units (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Purified PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced using a CEQ8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). All A. agassizii haplotypes were deposited in GenBank and correspond to accession numbers EF565745 [GenBank] –EF565820 [GenBank] (see Supplementary Material).

Population Structure Analyses
Sequences were edited in SeqMan (DNA* LASERGENE, Madison, WI) and aligned with ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) in MegAlign (DNA* LASERGENE). Alignments were examined visually in MACCLADE v4.0 (Maddison WP and Maddison DR 2000), and COII sequences were translated to ensure that stop codons were not present. 16S and COII alignments are available in TreeBASE. Repetitive sequences were collapsed into representative haplotypes in COLLAPSE v1.2 (http://darwin.uvigo.es/). Preliminary analyses of 16S and COII indicated that they were congruent and were subsequently combined for select analyses.

Parsimony networks were constructed using mtDNA haplotypes in TCS v1.18 (Clement et al. 2000), with a 95% connection limit between haplotypes. Gaps were treated as missing data. To determine the number of genetic populations present across the sampled range of A. agassizii, pairwise {Phi}ST were computed between all collection stations in ARLEQUIN v3.1 (Excoffier et al. 2005). Accordingly, collection stations where pairwise comparisons were not significantly different from zero were pooled in subsequent analyses. ARLEQUIN was used to perform an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) on mtDNA sequences to assess how haplotypic variation is partitioned geographically. For the AMOVA, variance was partitioned into 3 hierarchical components: within collection stations ({Phi}ST), among collection stations within a clade ({Phi}SC), and among clades ({Phi}CT), where clades were determined by phylogenetic analysis (see below). For both pairwise {Phi}ST and AMOVA, a 16S + COII concatenated data set with 10 000 permutations and the Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Nei 1993) with among-site rate variation were used.

Nucleotide ({pi}) and haplotype (h) diversities were calculated in DNASP v4.1 (Rozas et al. 2003). Isolation by distance among collection stations was tested using a Mantel test (Mantel 1967) in ARLEQUIN with 1000 permutations. For the Mantel test, 16S + COII pairwise {Phi}ST values were used for genetic distances, and the linear distance between collection stations was log10 transformed and used for geographic distances.

Tajima's D (Tajima 1989) test statistic was calculated in DNASP to evaluate the assumption of selective neutrality of mtDNA sequences. Mismatch analyses were done in DNASP by comparing the observed versus expected distribution of pairwise nucleotide differences between 16S and COII haplotypes to determine if population expansion had occurred in the history of A. agassizii. Population expansion was also evaluated by the neutrality test because values significantly different from zero can be indicative not only of selection but also of demographic patterns such as past population expansion (Aris-Brosou and Excoffier 1996). With the exception of the haplotype network analysis, population-level analyses were performed only with collection stations where 4 or more individuals were sampled.

In order to evaluate levels of migration between pairs of populations, an Markov chain Monte Carlo approach was taken as implemented in the program MDIV (Nielsen and Wakeley 2001; http://cbsuapps.tc.cornell.edu/mdiv.aspx). Initial runs were done with all population pairs (where N ≥ 6) to obtain an upper limit of the scaled migration rate (Mmax) for subsequent runs. Three independent runs with different random number seeds were completed for each comparison and results averaged. For these analyses, the finite-sites model Hasegawa, Kishino, and Yano (HKY) was used, with Markov chain length = 5 x 106, 10% burn-in, and Mmax = 10, 25, 50, or 100. The migration rate per generation was determined by the M value with highest posterior probability.

Phylogenetic and Genetic Distance Analyses
Phylogenetic relationships among mtDNA haplotypes were estimated using Bayesian methods in MRBAYES v3.1 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). For Bayesian analysis, 16S and COII were treated as unlinked partitions and MRMODELTEST v2.2 (Nylander 2004) was used to determine the best-fit model for each partition under the Akaike information criterion (AIC). For 16S, the HKY + I + {Gamma} model was selected, whereas for COII, the GTR + {Gamma} model was chosen. Conditions for analysis were uniform prior distribution of parameters and 2 sets of 4 simultaneous chains run for 1 x 106 generations with trees sampled every 100 generations. Stationarity was evaluated by examining log-likelihood values per generation. Burn-in trees were discarded before computing a 50% majority-rule consensus tree with nodal support given by the posterior probability of each recovered clade. Resulting topologies were rooted with the outgroup species Astrohamma tuberculatum.

Genetic distances were calculated using 16S + COII combined data in PAUP* v4.0 (Swofford 2002) in order to evaluate levels of divergence within A. agassizii. MODELTEST v3.7 (Posada and Crandall 1998) was used to determine the best-fit model of sequence evolution under the AIC for the corrected genetic distances. The transversional model with gamma shape parameter ({alpha} = 0.778) and proportion of invariable sites (0.7696) was selected.


    Results
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 
In total, 118 individuals were sequenced for 16S (490 bp) and COII (493 bp), resulting in a 983-bp concatenated data set. The combined data set included 64 mitochondrial haplotypes, representing 25 individuals from Antarctica and 93 from South America. No insertions, deletions, or stop codons were observed among the 118 individuals for COII. For 16S, the inclusion of a few gaps was required for alignment.

Population Structure
Parsimony network analysis resulted in 3 haplotype networks, whether mtDNA gene fragments were analyzed separately (data not shown) or combined (Figure 2). For the combined data, network 1 (=clade 1) included 38 haplotypes from 58 individuals from South America, network 2 (=clade 2) was composed of 14 haplotypes from 35 individuals from South America, and network 3 (=clade 3) included 12 haplotypes from 25 individuals from Antarctica.


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Bayesian tree of unique 16S + COII mtDNA haplotypes, with corresponding haplotype networks for each of 3 phylogenetic clades. Numbers next to nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities. On the Bayesian tree, haplotypes are labeled according to station. In networks, circles are coded by station and a unique key is given for each clade. Coding does not overlap between clades. Haplotypes are sized according to relative abundance, and missing haplotypes are denoted by small, closed black circles.

 
Pairwise {Phi}ST (Table 2) indicated that some collection stations within South America were genetically indistinct from one another, as were all collection stations within Antarctica. South American stations 1, 3, and 8 from clade 1 and stations 4 and 14 from clade 2 were pooled. In Antarctica, all collection stations (where N > 4) were pooled (stations 47, 82, and 85). Within clade 1, {Phi}ST values were significant for every pairwise comparison that included station 5, suggesting that this station is genetically isolated from other clade 1 stations. As expected, between-clade {Phi}ST values approached 1.0 due to the 3 clades being fixed for alternate mtDNA haplotypes. AMOVA results (Table 3) further confirmed genetic isolation between clades as the greatest proportion of variance (84%, P = 0.0001) was attributable to that between clades. The second largest variance proportion (11%, P < 0.0001) was that within collection stations, whereas only 5% (P < 0.0001) was attributable to that between collection stations within a clade.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Pairwise {Phi}ST for each collection station in South America and Antarctica

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Hierarchical AMOVA for South American and Antarctic populations of Astrotoma agassizii

 
Corroborating parsimony network results, nucleotide ({pi}) and haplotype (h) diversity values indicated that clade 1 was more genetically diverse than clades 2 or 3 (Table 4; 16S and COII analyzed separately). These latter clades exhibited much lower levels of nucleotide and haplotype diversities, with the exception of COII haplotype diversity, which was slightly higher in clades 2 and 3 compared with clade 1. Results of the Mantel test, performed only on collection stations within clades 1 and 3 given that clade 2 contained only 2 geographic localities, did not support isolation by distance for stations within clade 1 (r = –0.03; P = 0.49) or clade 3 (r = 0.02; P = 0.51).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Genetic diversity statistics for pooled Astrotoma agassizii collection stations, N refers to number of individuals, H is the number of haplotypes, {pi} refers to nucleotide diversity, and h is haplotype diversity

 
Tajima's D was negative but nonsignificant for 16S, whereas 3 populations (station 5, station 9, and stations 4/14) had significantly negative values for COII (Figure 3), indicative of past population expansion (Aris-Brosou and Excoffier 1996). The shape of the 16S and COII mismatch distributions was unimodal for clades 2 and 3 (Figure 3), suggesting past population expansion. Clade 1 distributions were primarily ragged and multimodal (Figure 3), suggesting stable population size (Harpending et al. 1998). However, stations 5 and 9 COII mismatch distributions were characterized by a high-frequency peak corresponding to low pairwise differences and a secondary low-frequency peak corresponding to higher number of pairwise differences, potentially explaining the significantly negative Tajima's D value for these 2 stations.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Mismatch distributions and Tajima's D statistic for pooled Astrotoma agassizii collection stations. Significant Tajima's D values are indicated by P < 0.05.

 
Migration analyses revealed stations 47 and 82 (clade 3) from Antarctica to be experiencing the highest levels of gene flow. These 2 collection stations were the most geographically distant populations sampled in Antarctica (with sufficient numbers to perform analyses); therefore, it is presumed that geographically intermediate stations are experiencing equivalent if not higher levels of gene flow. For stations 47 and 82, the posterior probability distribution plateaued beyond M = 30 migrants per generation, with its highest value attained at M = 66. Although lower than clade 3, relatively high levels of gene flow were also estimated for clade 2. The best estimate of the number of migrants per generation between stations 4 and 14 was M = 9.5. For clade 1, migration rates between station 5 and both stations 1 and 3 (the furthest and closest stations to station 5, respectively) suggested little to no gene flow, as highest posterior probability values corresponded with less than 1 migrant per generation (M = 0.30, 0.32). Lack of gene flow is similarly reflected in significant pairwise {Phi}ST values for station 5. Between other clade 1 populations, migration rates were also low, albeit slightly higher than station 5 comparisons. Migration estimates between stations 1, 3, and 9 were around 1 migrant per generation (0.62–1.7).

Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Distances
Phylogenetic analysis of mtDNA haplotypes revealed 3 distinct lineages within A. agassizii, 2 in South America and 1 in Antarctica (Figure 2). These 3 clades correspond to the 3 networks recovered in the parsimony network analysis. The 2 South American clades (clades 1 and 2) were recovered as sister clades with a posterior probability of 0.94, whereas the Antarctic clade (clade 3) was supported as sister to the South American clades with a posterior probability of 0.99. Intraclade genetic distances were low, averaging from 0.34% (clade 3) to 1.13% (clade 1), whereas interclade distances were substantially higher, 4.8% between clades 1 and 2, 5.1% between clades 2 and 3, and 6.8% between clades 1 and 3.


    Discussion
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 
Cryptic Species in A. agassizii
Astrotoma agassizii is not a genetically contiguous, panmictic species but rather characterized by substantial levels of cryptic diversity. Parsimony network–based approaches to recognizing species boundaries have been advocated in recent years (Lee and ÓFoighil 2004; Tarjuelo et al. 2004; Uthicke et al. 2004; Addison and Hart 2005; Baratti et al. 2005; Jolly et al. 2005; Hart et al. 2006), where multiple haplotype networks have been interpreted as multiple species. According to these criteria, A. agassizii as currently defined constitutes at least 3 putative species. Three networks were recovered at the 95% connection limit, and each network can tentatively be inferred as corresponding to a separate species. Phylogenetic analysis, pairwise {Phi}ST, and AMOVA provide additional support for the existence of 3 distinct lineages. Further, mtDNA genetic distances between the 3 clades ranged from 4.8% to 6.8%, and distances of this magnitude (5–7%) are typically found between echinoderm species easily distinguished by phenotypic or behavioral differences (Foltz 1997; Hart et al. 1997; Lessios et al. 2001; O'Loughlin et al. 2003; Uthicke and Benzie 2003; Waters and Roy 2003; Uthicke et al. 2004; Waters et al. 2004; Hart and Podolsky 2005).

Cryptic speciation has been documented extensively in the marine environment and reported for the Southern Ocean as well (Beaumont and Wei 1991; Held 2003; Held and Wägele 2005; Raupach and Wägele 2006; Wilson et al. 2007). Held (2003) discussed several criteria for establishing cryptic species. First, species in question should have a bimodal distribution of pairwise genetic distances with no intermediate values. Second, genetic divergence must be found at a level known to exist between sister species that are closely related to the species in question. Third, this level of divergence should be found among sympatric populations, although this last criterion was suggested to be less crucial. Astrotoma agassizii fulfills criterion 1 and likely criterion 2. Although no studies exist examining sister species closely related to A. agassizii, genetic divergences among other echinoderms are consistent with the hypothesis of separate species. Although genetically divergent sympatric populations were not sampled for this study, degree of spatial continuity between collection sites is unknown and divergent populations were found at sites separated by less than 80 km. Furthermore, examination of diagnostic morphological characters did not reveal fixed differences between clades. Namely, genital slit length, arm spine number, shape of teeth, and disc and arm granulation were uniform among voucher specimens from each collection station. Taken together, these data provide compelling evidence that A. agassizii is a complex of at least 3 cryptic species in the Southern Ocean.

Connectivity between Antarctica and South America
Data from this study indicate that A. agassizii in Antarctica is genetically distinct and geographically isolated from A. agassizii in South America. Gene flow is not occurring between Antarctic and South American populations. The Drake Passage separating Antarctica and South America spans approximately 900 km and reaches approximately 4500 m depths in some places (Whitworth et al. 1982), potentially beyond the range of dispersal or migration for A. agassizii. However, genetic homogeneity was found across distances greater than 500 km within the Antarctic continental shelf and across distances greater than 300 km within the South American continental shelf. Therefore, it is likely that the polar front and/or deep-water passages, but not sheer geographic distance, act as barriers to gene flow between Antarctica and South America. A similar pattern has been found in Antarctic demersal fish where genetic homogeneity is maintained within continental shelves but breaks down in populations separated by distances greater than 1000 km or deep-water troughs (Shaw et al. 2004). Restricted gene flow between shelf areas separated by great depths (1000–1750 m) has also been shown for the Antarctic octopus Pareledone turqueti (Allcock et al. 1997).

Studies investigating the role of the polar front in structuring Southern Ocean populations have shown it to be a barrier even for organisms with high dispersal potential, such as krill (Patarnello et al. 1996). However, other studies have shown the polar front to be penetrable. For example, bivalve sister species were inferred to have diverged after formation of the polar front, indicating that at one time individuals were able to disperse across this water mass (Page and Linse 2002). Using an approximate echinoderm mtDNA divergence rate of 3.1–3.5%/my (Lessios et al. 1999; McCartney et al. 2000), separation of Antarctic and South American populations of A. agassizii can be dated roughly at 1.4–1.6 mya, well after polar front formation 24–41 mya. These dates suggest that Antarctic and South American populations split well after the environmental factors that isolate Antarctica were established. In the case of A. agassizii, the polar front may have prevented high levels of gene flow but historically was not an absolute barrier. Even though these dates are crude estimates, the conclusion that dispersal occurred across the polar front at least once is a robust conclusion even if we assume a vastly slower echinoderm mtDNA molecular clock.

Restricted gene flow was also evident within the South American continental shelf. The 2 South American clades had lower interclade genetic distances when compared with the Antarctic clade. However, genetic distances were similar for clades 1–2 and clades 2–3 comparisons, indicating that the South American clades split soon after diverging from the common ancestor of all 3 clades. Comparisons of physical characteristics between collection stations belonging to the 2 South American clades revealed no obvious differences in depth distribution or faunal assemblages. Interestingly, samples from station 5 (clade 1), which were significantly differentiated from all other stations, were collected from substantially deeper depths (850 m) than any other South American samples. Conversely, station 47 in Antarctica was 900 m and showed no significant differentiation with any other Antarctic collection locality. Bathymetry may be an isolating force for South American populations of A. agassizii but not Antarctic populations, not surprising given Antarctic fauna are typically eurybathic (Hempel 1985).

Intraclade Population Structure
The Mantel test showed no evidence for increasing genetic differentiation with geographic distance. Within Antarctica, high levels of gene flow resulting in mtDNA homogeneity were demonstrated across a 518-km range throughout the Antarctic Peninsula, an unexpected result given the brooding nature of this species. Genetic homogeneity spanning large geographic distances has been reported for brooding marine invertebrates (Sponer and Roy 2002; Richards et al. 2007). Given that A. agassizii lacks a pelagic larval stage, this species must rely on dispersal of benthic adults or juveniles to maintain population connectivity. Passive transport of rafting adults has been suggested as a means of dispersal for brittle stars (Sponer and Roy 2002). Astrotoma agassizii is known to tightly wrap its coiled arms around gorgonians and hydrocorals (Bartsch 1982) and has been recorded climbing up rocks, sponges, bryozoans, and other sessile organisms projecting off the seafloor (Dearborn et al. 1986; Ferrari and Dearborn 1989). The epifaunal propensity of this species could provide numerous opportunities for passive transport of dislodged organisms. Furthermore, A. agassizii has been reported to occur in dense aggregations clinging to octocorals (Dearborn et al. 1986; Ferrari and Dearborn 1989), increasing the likelihood that individuals could be dislodged and carried by ocean currents to other geographic localities. Juveniles and small adults probably have a greater chance for passive dispersal due to the large size attained by full-grown adults (≤60 mm disc diameter; Mortensen 1936).

Migration of adults/juveniles along the Antarctic continental shelf could also maintain connectivity across these distances. Benthic migration seems less plausible, however, because A. agassizii is irregularly distributed throughout Antarctica, occurring primarily in locally abundant patches (Dearborn et al. 1986). Therefore, connectivity via movement of adults/juveniles along the continental shelf is less likely and dispersal probably occurs by occasional uprooting of small adults or juveniles attached to sessile substrate and passively dispersed by ocean currents. Passive transport between A. agassizii patches throughout the Antarctic Peninsula could occur from Bransfield Strait (Figure 1) to the southern peninsula, and vice versa. A surface current circulates counterclockwise around the Antarctic coast (Phillpot 1985) and could promote dispersal from Bransfield Strait southward. Conversely, water from the Bellingshausen Sea in the southern peninsula flows north into the Bransfield Strait (Wilson et al. 1999) and could allow for northern transport.

In South America, significant genetic differentiation was absent within clade 1 across distances as great as 320 km, despite low levels of ongoing gene flow. Conversely, high migration was shown for clade 2; however, clade 2 populations are separated by only 131 km. The fact that clade 1 and 2 individuals are separated by 72–484 km suggests that dispersal ability may not be the primary factor driving isolation between these clades. Instead, present-day population structure in South America may be explained by allopatric divergence of clades 1 and 2. For example, station 14 of clade 2, situated at the easternmost margin of the sampled range of A. agassizii, or a similar unsampled population, could have at one time been sufficiently peripheral for allopatric divergence to occur, resulting in 2 South American clades. Subsequently, this once isolated population could have undergone population expansion resulting in a wider distribution. Past population expansion is supported for clade 2 based on the negative Tajima's D value, unimodal mismatch distribution, and shape of the haplotype network. The demographic history of clade 1, the more widely sampled and genetically diverse clade, was characterized by stable population size for some populations, whereas others showed signatures of past population expansion.

Interestingly, within South America, there were 2 instances of divergent haplotypes co-occurring at the same collection station. Station 5 was composed exclusively of clade 1 haplotypes with the exception of a single individual possessing a clade 2 haplotype. This occurrence could be the result of a rare migration event between stations 5 and 14 (where the majority of that clade 2 haplotype were sampled), or additional sampling could reveal clades 1 and 2 to be existing sympatrically at this locale. Similarly, station 7b, where only 2 individuals were sampled, was characterized by a single clade 1 haplotype and a single clade 2 haplotype.

In summary, A. agassizii is characterized by unexpected levels of genetic diversity and represents a complex of cryptic species. Populations of A. agassizii separated by the polar front are genetically isolated and belong to separate lineages. Paradoxically, this "species" was also found to have unexpected levels of genetic continuity for a brooding invertebrate over large geographic distances within continental shelf regions. Similar levels of genetic diversity and divergence likely exist within many other Southern Ocean benthic invertebrates. Additional work is needed to further document biodiversity in this isolated biogeographic region in order to more fully understand the dynamic physical processes and extreme environmental conditions driving this diversity.


    Supplementary Material
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 
Supplementary material can be found at http://www.jhered.oxfordjournals.org/.


    Funding
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 
National Science Foundation (OPP-9910164, OPP-0338087, and OPP-0338218 to K.M.H. and R.S.S. and 0091853 to Auburn University's Center for Environmental and Cellular Signal Transduction).


    Acknowledgments
 
Crew and participants in the 2004 and 2006 Antarctic cruises aboard the R/V Laurence M. Gould are gratefully acknowledged for their help and logistical support in collecting samples. Helpful comments to the manuscript were provided by Scott Santos from Auburn University. This work is Auburn University Marine Biology Program contribution #30.


    Footnotes
 
Corresponding Editor: Jill Pecon-Slattery

Received May 18, 2007
Accepted November 3, 2007


    References
 Top
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Funding
 References
 

    Addison JA, Hart MW. Colonization, dispersal, and hybridization influence phylogeography of north Atlantic sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). Evolution (2005) 59:532–543.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Allcock AL, Brierley AS, Thorpe JP, Rodhouse PG. Restricted gene flow and evolutionary divergence between geographically separated populations of the Antarctic octopus Pareledone turqueti. Mar Biol. (1997) 129:97–102.[CrossRef]

    Aris-Brosou S, Excoffier L. The impact of population expansion and mutation rate heterogeneity on DNA sequence polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. (1996) 13:494–504.[Abstract]

    Arndt A, Smith MJ. Genetic diversity and population structure in two species of sea cucumber: differing patterns according to mode of development. Mol Ecol (1998) 7:1053–1064.[CrossRef]

    Arntz WE, Brey T, Gallardo VA. Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. (1994) 32:241–304.

    Baratti M, Goti E, Messana G. High level of genetic differentiation in the marine isopod Sphaeroma terebrans (Crustacea Isopoda Sphaeromatidae) as inferred by mitochondrial DNA analysis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol (2005) 315:225–234.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Bargelloni L, Marcato S, Zane L, Patarnello T. Mitochondrial phylogeny of notothenioids: a molecular approach to Antarctic fish evolution and biogeography. Syst Biol. (2000) 49:114–129.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Bargelloni L, Zane L, Derome N, Lecointre G, Patarnello T. Molecular zoogeography of Antarctic euphausiids and notothenioids: from species phylogenies to intraspecific patterns of genetic variation. Antarct Sci. (2000) 12:259–268.

    Bartsch I. Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from the Patagonian Shelf. Mitt Hambg Zool Mus Inst (1982) 79:211–250.

    Beaumont AR, Wei JHC. Morphological and genetic variation in the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Strebel, 1908). J Molluscan Stud (1991) 57:443–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Berger E. Gene-enzyme variation in three sympatric species of Littorina. Biol Bull. (1973) 145:83–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bernasconi I. Astrotoma agassizii Lyman, especie vivipara del Atlantico sur (Ophiuroidea, Gorgonocephalidae). Physis (1965) 25:1–5.[Medline]

    Brandt A. Zur besiedlungsgeschichte des antarktischen schelfes am beispiel der Isopoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca). Ber Polarforsch (1991) 98:1–240.

    Brierley AS, Rodhouse PG, Thorpe JP, Clarke MR. Genetic evidence of population heterogeneity and cryptic speciation in the ommastrephid squid Martialia hyadesi from the Patagonian Shelf and Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone. Mar Biol. (1993) 116:593–602.[CrossRef]

    Burton RS. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow among natural populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull Mar Sci. (1986) 39:526–535.

    Clarke A, Barnes DKA, Hodgson DA. How isolated is Antarctica? Trends Ecol Evol. (2005) 20:1–3.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol (2000) 9:1657–1659.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Crisp DJ. Genetic consequences of different reproductive strategies in marine invertebrates. In: Marine organisms: genetics, ecology and evolution—Battaglia B, Beardmore HA, eds. (1978) New York: Plenum Press. 257–273.

    Dayton PK, Mordida BJ, Bacon F. Polar marine communities. Am Zool (1994) 34:90–99.[Web of Science]

    Dearborn JH, Ferrari FD, Edwards KC. Can pelagic aggregations cause benthic satiation? Feeding biology of the Antarctic brittle star Astrotoma agassizii (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Biology of the Antarctic Seas XVII. Antarct Res Ser (1986) 44:1–28.

    DeConto RM, Pollard D. Rapid Cenozoic glaciation of Antarctica induced by declining atmospheric CO2. Nature (2003) 421:245–249.[CrossRef]

    De La Serna, De Estaban CJ. Consideraciones preliminares sobre la reproduccion de Astrotoma agassizii Lyman, 1876 (Ophiuroidea, Euryalae). Physis (1966) 26:89–94.

    Dell RK. Antarctic benthos. Adv Mar Biol. (1972) 10:1–216.[CrossRef]

    Duffy JE. Genetic population structure in two sponge-dwelling shrimps that differ in dispersal potential. Mar Biol. (1993) 116:459–470.[CrossRef]

    Eastman JT. Antarctic fish biology: evolution in a unique environment. (1993) San Diego (CA): Academic Press.

    Ekman S. Zoogeography of the sea (1953) London: Sidgwick and Jackson.

    Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. ARLEQUIN: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Version 3. Evol Bioinform Online (2005) 1:47–50.

    Fell HB, Holzinger T, Sherraden M. Ophiuroidea. In: Antarctic map folio series: distribution of selected groups of marine invertebrates in waters south of 35°S latitude—Bushnell VC, Hedgpeth JW, eds. (1969) New York: American Geographical Society. 42–43.

    Ferrari FD, Dearborn JH. A second examination of predation on pelagic copepods by the brittle star Astrotoma agassizii. J Plankton Res. (1989) 11:1315–1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Foltz DW. Hybridization frequency is negatively correlated with divergence time of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in a sea star (Leptasterias spp.) species complex. Evolution (1997) 51:283–288.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Hare MP, Avise JC. Molecular genetic analysis of a stepped multilocus cline in the American Oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Evolution (1996) 50:2305–2315.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Harpending HC, Batzer MA, Gurven M, Jorde LB, Rogers AR, Sherry ST. Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1998) 95:1961–1967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hart MW, Byrne M, Smith MJ. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of life-history evolution in asterinid starfish. Evolution (1997) 51:1848–1861.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Hart MW, Keever CC, Dartnall AJ, Byrne M. Morphological and genetic variation indicate cryptic species within Lamarck's Little Sea Star, Parvulastra (=Patiriella) exigua. Biol Bull. (2006) 210:158–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hart MW, Podolsky RD. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny and rates of larval evolution in Macrophiothrix brittlestars. Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2005) 34:438–447.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Held C. Molecular evidence for cryptic speciation within the widespread Antarctic crustacean Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Crustacea, Isopoda). In: Antarctic biology in a global context—Huiskes AH, Gieskes WW, Rozema J, Schorno RM, van der Vies SM, Wolff WJ, eds. (2003) Leiden (The Netherlands): Backhuys Publishers. 135–139.

    Held C, Wägele J-W. Cryptic speciation in the giant Antarctic isopod Glyptonotus antarcticus (Isopoda: Valvifera: Chaetiliidae). Sci Mar. (2005) 69:175–181.

    Hellberg M. Dependence of gene flow on geographic distance in two solitary corals with different larval dispersal capabilities. Evolution (1996) 50:1167–1175.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Hempel G. On the biology of polar seas, particularly the Southern Ocean. In: Marine biology of polar regions and effects of stress on marine organisms—Gray JS, Christiansen ME, eds. (1985) New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 3–33.

    Hoskin MG. Effects of contrasting modes of larval development on the genetic structures of populations of three species of prosobranch gastropods. Mar Biol. (1997) 127:647–656.[CrossRef]

    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:754–755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hunt A. Effects of contrasting patterns of larval dispersal on the genetic connectedness of local populations of two intertidal starfish, Patiriella calcar and P. exigua. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (1993) 92:179–186.[CrossRef]

    Janson K. Allozyme and shell variation in two marine snails (Littorina, Prosobranchia) with different dispersal abilities. Biol J Linn Soc. (1987) 30:245–256.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Jazdzewski K, Teodorczyk W, Sicinski J, Kontek B. Amphipod crustaceans as an important component of zoobenthos of the shallow Antarctic sublittoral. Hydrobiologia (1991) 223:105–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Jolly MT, Jollivet D, Gentil F, Thiébaut E, Viard F. Sharp genetic break between Atlantic and English Channel populations of the polychaete Pectinaria koreni along the north coast of France. J Hered (2005) 94:23–32.[CrossRef]

    Knox GA, Lowry JK. A comparison between the benthos of the Southern Ocean and the North Polar Ocean with special reference to the Amphipoda and Polychaeta. In: Polar oceans—Dunbar MJ, ed. (1977) Calgary (Canada): Arctic Institute of North America. 423–462.

    Lawver LA, Gahagan LM. Evolution of Cenozoic seaways in the circum-Antarctic region. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol (2003) 198:11–37.[CrossRef]

    Lee T, ÓFoighil D. Hidden Floridian biodiversity: mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees reveal four cryptic species within the scorched mussel, Brachidontes exustus, species complex. Mol Ecol (2004) 13:3527–3542.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Lessios HA, Kessing BD, Pearse JS. Population structure and speciation in tropical seas: global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution (2001) 55:955–975.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Lessios HA, Kessing BD, Robertson DR, Paulay G. Phylogeography of the pantropical sea urchin Eucidaris in relation to land barriers and ocean currents. Evolution (1999) 53:806–817.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Maddison WP, Maddison DR. MacClade. Version 4.0 (2000) Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.

    Mantel NA. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. (1967) 27:209–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    McCartney MA, Keller G, Lessios HA. Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation of Atlantic and eastern Pacific Echinometra sea urchins. Mol Ecol (2000) 9:1391–1400.[CrossRef][Medline]

    McMillan WO, Raff RA, Palumbi SR. Population genetic consequences of developmental evolution in sea urchins (genus Heliocidaris). Evolution (1992) 46:1299–1312.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Mortensen T. Echinoidea and Ophiuroidea. Discov Rep (1936) 12:199–348.

    Nielsen R, Wakeley JW. Distinguishing migration from isolation: an MCMC approach. Genetics (2001) 158:885–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Nylander JAA. MRMODELTEST. In: Version 2. Distributed by the author (2004) Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.

    O'Loughlin PM, Waters JM, Roy MS. A molecular and morphological review of the asterinid Patiriella gunnii (Gray) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Mem Mus Vic (2003) 60:181–195.

    Page TJ, Linse K. More evidence of speciation and dispersal across the Antarctic Polar Front through molecular systematics of Southern Ocean Limatula (Bivalvia: Limidae). Polar Biol. (2002) 25:818–826.[Web of Science]

    Palumbi SR. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst (1994) 25:547–572.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Palumbi SR, Martin AP, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. The simple fool's guide to PCR. In: Special publication (1991) Honolulu: Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii.

    Patarnello T, Bargelloni L, Varotto V, Battaglia B. Krill evolution and the Antarctic ocean currents: evidence of vicariant speciation as inferred by molecular data. Mar Biol. (1996) 126:603–608.[CrossRef]

    Pfuhl HA, McCave IN. Evidence for late Oligocene establishment of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Earth Planet Sci Lett. (2005) 235:715–728.[CrossRef]

    Phillpot HR. Physical geography–climate. In: Key environments: Antarctica—Bonner WN, Walton DWH, eds. (1985) Oxford: Pergamon Press. 23–38.

    Posada D, Crandall KA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (1998) 14:817–818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Raupach MJ, Wägele J-W. Distinguishing cryptic species in Antarctic Asellota (Crustacea: Isopoda)—a preliminary study of mitochondrial DNA in Acanthaspidia drygalskii. Antarct Sci. (2006) 18:191–198.[CrossRef]

    Richards VP, Thomas JD, Stanhope MJ, Shivji MS. Genetic connectivity in the Florida reef system: comparative phylogeography of commensal invertebrates with contrasting reproductive strategies. Mol Ecol (2007) 16:139–157.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Robinson AR. Eddies in marine science (1983) New York: Springer.

    Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DNASP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics (2003) 19:2496–2497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Scheltema RS. On dispersal and planktonic larvae of benthic invertebrates: an eclectic overview and summary of problems. Bull Mar Sci. (1986) 39:290–322.

    Scher HD, Martin EE. Timing and climatic consequences of the opening of Drake Passage. Science (2006) 312:428–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Shaw PW, Arkhipkin AI, Al-Khairulla H. Genetic structuring of Patagonian toothfish populations in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean: the effect of the Antarctic Polar Front and deep-water troughs as barriers to genetic exchange. Mol Ecol (2004) 13:3293–3303.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Sponer R, Roy MS. Phylogeographic analysis of the brooding brittle star Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata) along the coast of New Zealand reveals high cryptic genetic variation and cryptic dispersal potential. Evolution (2002) 56:1954–1967.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Stankovic A, Spalik K, Kamler E, Borsuk P, Weglenski P. Recent origin of sub-Antarctic notothenioids. Polar Biol. (2002) 25:203–205.[Web of Science]

    Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). In: Version 4 (2002) Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.

    Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics (1989) 125:585–593.[Web of Science]

    Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. (1993) 10:512–526.[Abstract]

    Tarjuelo I, Posada D, Crandall KA, Pascual M, Turon X. Phylogeography and speciation of colour morphs in the colonial ascidian Pseudodistoma crucigaster. Mol Ecol (2004) 13:3125–3136.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Tracey ML, Nelson K, Hedgecock D, Shleser RA, Pressick ML. Biochemical genetics of lobsters: genetic variation and the structure of American lobster (Homarus americanus). J Fish Res Board Can. (1975) 32:2091–2101.

    Uthicke S, Benzie JAH. Gene flow and population history in high dispersal marine invertebrates: mitochondrial DNA analysis of Holothuria nobilis (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) populations from the Indo-Pacific. Mol Ecol (2003) 13:2635–2648.

    Uthicke S, O'Hara TD, Byrne M. Species composition and molecular phylogeny of the Indo-Pacific teatfish (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) beche-de-mer fishery. Mar Freshw Res. (2004) 55:837–848.[CrossRef]

    Waters JM, O'Loughlin PM, Roy MS. Cladogenesis in a starfish species complex from southern Australia: evidence for vicariant speciation? Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2004) 32:236–245.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Waters JM, Roy MS. Marine biogeography of southern Australia: phylogeographical structure in a temperate sea-star. J Biogeogr (2003) 30:1787–1796.[CrossRef]

    Whitworth T, Nowlin WD, Worley SJ. The net transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current through Drake Passage. J Phys Oceanogr (1982) 12:960–971.[CrossRef]

    Wilson C, Klinkhammer GP, Chin CS. Hydrography within the Central and East Basins of the Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. J Phys Oceanogr (1999) 29:465–479.[CrossRef]

    Wilson NG, Hunter RL, Lockhart SJ, Halanych KM. Absence of panmixia in the Antarctic ‘circumpolar’ crinoid Promachocrinus kerguelensis Carpenter, 1888. Mar Biol. (2007) 152:895–904.[CrossRef]

    Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to Present. Science (2001) 292:686–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. C. Marshall
Cryptic Failure of Partitioned Bayesian Phylogenetic Analyses: Lost in the Land of Long Trees
Syst Biol, November 17, 2009; (2009) syp080v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/137    most recent
esm119v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Halanych, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Halanych, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?