The Journal of Heredity 2000:91(3)
© 2000 The American Genetic Association 91:221-227
Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome
1Harvard University Society of Fellows, 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA *Corresponding author E-mail: dhartl@oeg.harvard.edu
Pseudogenes are nonfunctional copies of protein-coding genes that are presumed to evolve without selective constraints on their coding function. They are of considerable utility in evolutionary genetics because, in the absence of selection, different types of mutations in pseudogenes should have equal probabilities of fixation. This theoretical inference justifies the estimation of patterns of spontaneous mutation from the analysis of patterns of substitutions in pseudogenes. Although it is possible to test whether pseudogene sequences evolve without constraints for their protein-coding function, it is much more difficult to ascertain whether pseudogenes may affect fitness in ways unrelated to their nucleotide sequences. Consider the possibility that a pseudogene affects fitness merely by increasing genome size. If a larger genome is deleterious - for example, because of increased energetic costs associated with genome replication and maintenance - then deletions, which decrease the length of a pseudogene, should be selectively advantageous relative to insertions or nucleotide substitutions. In this article we examine the implications of selection for genome size relative to small (1-400 bp) deletions, in light of empirical evidence pertaining to the size distribution of deletions observed in Drosophila and mammalian pseudogenes. There is a large difference in the deletion spectra between these organisms. We argue that this difference cannot easily be attributed to selection for overall genome size, since the magnitude of selection is unlikely to be strong enough to significantly affect the probability of fixation of small deletions in Drosophila.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. Macpherson, J. Gonzalez, D. M. Witten, J. C. Davis, N. A. Rosenberg, A. E. Hirsh, and D. A. Petrov Nonadaptive Explanations for Signatures of Partial Selective Sweeps in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1025 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. E. Shakhnovich and E. V. Koonin Origins and impact of constraints in evolution of gene families Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1529 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Ochman and L. M. Davalos The nature and dynamics of bacterial genomes. Science, March 24, 2006; 311(5768): 1730 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. BENNETZEN, J. MA, and K. M. DEVOS Mechanisms of Recent Genome Size Variation in Flowering Plants Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 127 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Podlaha and J. Zhang Nonneutral Evolution of the Transcribed Pseudogene Makorin1-p1 in Mice Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2202 - 2209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Prachumwat, L. DeVincentis, and M. F. Palopoli Intron Size Correlates Positively With Recombination Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1585 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Zhang, P. M. Harrison, Y. Liu, and M. Gerstein Millions of Years of Evolution Preserved: A Comprehensive Catalog of the Processed Pseudogenes in the Human Genome Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2541 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Harrison, D. Milburn, Z. Zhang, P. Bertone, and M. Gerstein Identification of pseudogenes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2003; 31(3): 1033 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Blumenstiel, D. L. Hartl, and E. R. Lozovsky Patterns of Insertion and Deletion in Contrasting Chromatin Domains Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2211 - 2225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Ptak and D. A. Petrov How Intron Splicing Affects the Deletion and Insertion Profile in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1233 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Dasilva, H. Hadji, C. Ozouf-Costaz, S. Nicaud, O. Jaillon, J. Weissenbach, and H. R. Crollius Remarkable compartmentalization of transposable elements and pseudogenes in the heterochromatin of the Tetraodon nigroviridis genome PNAS, October 15, 2002; 99(21): 13636 - 13641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Harrison, A. Kumar, N. Lang, M. Snyder, and M. Gerstein A question of size: the eukaryotic proteome and the problems in defining it Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2002; 30(5): 1083 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Fleury, D. Bergonier, X. Berthelot, Y. Schlatter, J. Frey, and E. M. Vilei Characterization and Analysis of a Stable Serotype-Associated Membrane Protein (P30) of Mycoplasma agalactiae J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2001; 39(8): 2814 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Hewes and P. H. Taghert Neuropeptides and Neuropeptide Receptors in the Drosophila melanogaster Genome Genome Res., June 1, 2001; 11(6): 1126 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|