Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Journal of Heredity 2000:91(6)
© 2000 The American Genetic Association 91:441-445

Physical location of homoeologous groups 5 and 6 molecular markers mapped in Triticum aestivum L.

XQ Zhang1,2, K Ross2, and JP Gustafson2

1Institute of Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, PRC 2USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit and Plant Sciences Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

In situ hybridization was used to map 21 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) probes to linkage groups 5 an 6 of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell). In order to compare physical distances and genetic distances between adjacent markers. All 21 probes hybridized to the corresponding homoeologous chromosome arms. The linear order and linkage relationships among the DNA probes on the in situ-based physical maps. However, significant differences were observed between the centiMorgan distances on a linkage map and the physical distances of the probes using in situ-based techniques. The results indicated a clustering of polymorphic RFLP markers in the middle of all of the homoeologous group 5 and 6 chromosome arms. This suggests that the available linkage maps do not completely cover the physical length of the chromosomes. As with the genetic maps, the physical map clearly showed the presence of nonhomoeologous rearrangements in the terminal regions of chromosome arms 5AL and 6BS. However, the physical mapping gave an indication of the physical size of the rearrangements as well as their arm location.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. M. Linkiewicz, L. L. Qi, B. S. Gill, A. Ratnasiri, B. Echalier, S. Chao, G. R. Lazo, D. D. Hummel, O. D. Anderson, E. D. Akhunov, et al.
A 2500-Locus Bin Map of Wheat Homoeologous Group 5 Provides Insights on Gene Distribution and Colinearity With Rice
Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 665 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.