Journal of Heredity Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2005
Journal of Heredity 2005 96(4):368-375; doi:10.1093/jhered/esi039
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimating Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations with Marker-Based Methods: An Experimental Test in Mimulus guttatus
From the Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Address correspondence to Mark van Kleunen, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Villa Liegnitz, Lennéstr. 7a, D-14471 Potsdam, Germany, or e-mail vkleunen{at}rz.uni-potsdam.de, kermit.ritland{at}ubc.ca.
The calculation of heritabilities and genetic correlations, which are necessary for predicting evolutionary responses, requires knowledge about the relatedness between individuals. This information is often not directly available, especially not for natural populations, but can be inferred by using molecular markers such as allozymes. Several methods based on inferred relatedness from marker data have been developed to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations in natural populations. Most methods use maximum-likelihood procedures to assign pairs or groups of individuals to predefined discrete relatedness classes (e.g., half sibs and unrelated individuals). The Ritland method, on the other hand, uses method of moments estimators to estimate pairwise relatedness among individuals as continuous values. We tested both the Ritland method and a maximum-likelihood method by applying them to a greenhouse population consisting of seed families of the herb Mimulus guttatus and comparing the results to the ones from a frequently used standard method based on half-sib families. Estimates of genetic correlations were far from accurate, especially when we used the Ritland method. However, this study shows that even with a few variable allozyme loci, it is possible to get qualitatively good indications about the presence of heritable genetic variation from marker-based methods, even though both methods underestimated it.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. D Frentiu, S. M Clegg, J. Chittock, T. Burke, M. W Blows, and I. P.F Owens Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2008; 275(1635): 639 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shikano Estimation of Quantitative Genetic Parameters Using Marker-Inferred Relatedness in Japanese Flounder: A Case Study of Upward Bias J. Hered., March 1, 2008; 99(2): 94 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

