Journal of Heredity Advance Access published online on January 13, 2005
Journal of Heredity, doi:10.1093/jhered/esi029
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, U-2131, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2131
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The centromere is a cytologically defined entity that possesses a conserved and restricted function in the cell: it is the site of kinetochore assembly and spindle attachment. Despite its conserved function, the centromere is a highly mutable portion of the chromosome, carrying little sequence conservation across taxa. This divergence has made studying the movement of a centromere, either within a single karyotype or between species, a challenging endeavor. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the permutability of centromere location within a chromosome. This permutability is termed "centromere repositioning" when described in an evolutionary context and "neocentromerization" when abnormalities within an individual karyotype are considered. Both are characterized by a shift in location of the functional centromere within a chromosome without a concomitant change in linear gene order. Evolutionary studies across lineages clearly indicate that centromere repositioning is not a rare event in karyotypic evolution and must be considered when examining the evolution of chromosome structure and syntenic order. This paper examines the theories proposed to explain centromere repositioning in mammals. These theories are interpreted in light of evidence gained in human studies and in our presented data from the marsupial model species Macropus eugenii, the tammar wallaby. *Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Article
Retention of Latent Centromeres in the Mammalian Genome
2 From the Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia
R. J. O'Neill, E-mail: roneill{at}uconnvm.uconn.edu
![]()
Abstract
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Han, Z. Zhang, C. Liu, J. Liu, S. Huang, J. Jiang, and W. Jin Centromere repositioning in cucurbit species: Implication of the genomic impact from centromere activation and inactivation PNAS, September 1, 2009; 106(35): 14937 - 14941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Schaeffer, A. Bhutkar, B. F. McAllister, M. Matsuda, L. M. Matzkin, P. M. O'Grady, C. Rohde, V. L. S. Valente, M. Aguade, W. W. Anderson, et al. Polytene Chromosomal Maps of 11 Drosophila Species: The Order of Genomic Scaffolds Inferred From Genetic and Physical Maps Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1601 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Metcalfe, K. V. Bulazel, G. C. Ferreri, E. Schroeder-Reiter, G. Wanner, W. Rens, C. Obergfell, M. D. B. Eldridge, and R. J. O'Neill Genomic Instability Within Centromeres of Interspecific Marsupial Hybrids Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2507 - 2517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Gentles, M. J. Wakefield, O. Kohany, W. Gu, M. A. Batzer, D. D. Pollock, and J. Jurka Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements in the short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 992 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ventura, F. Antonacci, M. F. Cardone, R. Stanyon, P. D'Addabbo, A. Cellamare, L. J. Sprague, E. E. Eichler, N. Archidiacono, and M. Rocchi Evolutionary Formation of New Centromeres in Macaque Science, April 13, 2007; 316(5822): 243 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Veyrunes, G. Dobigny, F. Yang, P. C.M O'Brien, J. Catalan, T. J Robinson, and J. Britton-Davidian Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2006; 273(1604): 2925 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rocchi, N. Archidiacono, and R. Stanyon Ancestral genomes reconstruction: An integrated, multi-disciplinary approach is needed Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1441 - 1444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




