Skip Navigation



Journal of Heredity Advance Access published online on October 26, 2005
Journal of Heredity, doi:10.1093/jhered/esi120
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/713    most recent
esi120v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saavedra, C.
Right arrow Articles by Amat, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saavedra, C.
Right arrow Articles by Amat, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The American Genetic Association. 2005. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Received March 11, 2004
Accepted March 30, 2005

Brief Communication

Maternal Effects on Encystment in Crosses Between Two Geographic Strains of Artemia franciscana

C. Saavedra 1* and F. Amat 1

1 From the Instituto de Acuicultura de Torre la Sal, CSIC, Ribera de Cabanes, 12595 Castellón, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
C. Saavedra, E-mail: saavedra{at}iats.csic.es


  Abstract

Maternal effects can have environmental or genetic causes. A method that can be used to demonstrate the genetic basis of a maternal effect is to look for grandfather effects in a backcross following reciprocal crosses. The absence of a grandfather effect would exclude a chromosomal basis for the maternal effect when the male sex is heterogametic (XX-XY sex determination system). However, in organisms in which the female is heterogametic (ZW-ZZ sex determination system), the absence of a grandfather effect does not rule out a chromosomal basis of the maternal effect, since the genes responsible for that effect can be located in the W chromosome, which is transmitted matrilineally. Conversely, the absence of a grandfather effect would point to a W-chromosome basis for the trait, provided that a maternal effect has been previously demonstrated. Distinguishing between W-located and autosome or Z-located maternal effects is important to understand the evolutionary dynamics of a trait. Here we report on a study of the chromosomal basis of maternal effects on two life-history traits related to encystment in the branchiopod crustacean Artemia franciscana, in which females are heterogametic. We performed crosses of two populations that differ in the number of cysts they produce. The proportion of encysted broods showed a maternal effect and was not affected by the grandfather's genotype, pointing to a W-chromosome basis. The average number of encysted offspring per brood showed a strong paternal effect and also a slight maternal effect. This trait also showed a grandfather effect, which suggests that the geographical variation has an autosomal or Z-chromosomal basis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.